| Model Number |
45-750617 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Unraveled Material (1664); Separation Failure (2547)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/18/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A search for non-conformances associated with this part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device was stated to be available for return to the manufacturer for evaluation but has not yet been returned despite a device return attempt.Ongoing attempts will be made for the device return.The alleged product issue/event as described could not be confirmed.If the device is received at a later date, an investigation will be performed and a supplemental mdr will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported: the coil could be inserted and placed in the vessel via the catheter without any problems; detachment with the controller also went as usual.The wire could be withdrawn without resistance and without moving the coil.During the visual inspection before inserting the next coil, an approximately 12cm long piece of the coil (pulled into the length) was found in the end piece of the inserted catheter.This defective part of the coil protruded into the brachiocephalic trunk and could be retrieved from the patient together with the remaining coil.The same size was taken from the consignment store again and fitted without any problems.No harm to patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Items returned for evaluation: implant.Items not returned for evaluation: pusher, introducer, and catheter.The implant was returned stretched at the proximal section and separated from the pusher.The pusher was not returned for evaluation.The investigation found the implant's monofilament to have a mushroom profile at the proximal end with tensile break at the distal end, indicating that the device experienced delayed detachment.The investigation of the returned coil system found the implant to be stretched at the proximal section and separated from the pusher.The pusher was not returned for evaluation.The investigation found the implant's monofilament profiled a mushroom shape at the proximal end and a tensile break at the distal end, indicating that the implant experienced a partial/delayed detachment.This condition is consistent with a partial thermal activation resulting in the implant to not separate until the device experienced force that exceeded the strength of the monofilament causing the implant to separate from the pusher, likely during device withdrawal as described in the reported event.The physical evaluation of the device could not identify the conditions or circumstances that led to the stretched implant, but stretching is consistent with the device experiencing forces exceeding the implant's yield strength.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported: the coil could be inserted and placed in the vessel via the catheter without any problems; detachment with the controller also went as usual.The wire could be withdrawn without resistance and without moving the coil.During the visual inspection before inserting the next coil, an approximately 12cm long piece of the coil (pulled into the length) was found in the end piece of the inserted catheter.This defective part of the coil protruded into the brachiocephalic trunk and could be retrieved from the patient together with the remaining coil.The same size was taken from the consignment store again and fitted without any problems.No harm to patient.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported: the coil could be inserted and placed in the vessel via the catheter without any problems; detachment with the controller also went as usual.The wire could be withdrawn without resistance and without moving the coil.During the visual inspection before inserting the next coil, an approximately 12cm long piece of the coil (pulled into the length) was found in the end piece of the inserted catheter.This defective part of the coil protruded into the brachiocephalic trunk and could be retrieved from the patient together with the remaining coil.The same size was taken from the consignment store again and fitted without any problems.No harm to patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Corrected medical device problem code in section h to "unraveled material.".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|