• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORCYM CANADA CORP. PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE; TISSUE HEART VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORCYM CANADA CORP. PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE; TISSUE HEART VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number PVS25
Medical Device Problem Code Degraded (1153)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Insufficient Information (4580)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The manufacturing and material records for the device and nitinol stent involved in this event, as they pertain to the reported issue, were retrieved and reviewed by the manufacturer¿s quality engineering.The results confirmed that this prosthesis and its component stent satisfied all required material, visual, and performance standards at the time of manufacture and release.Since the device is still implanted and, as such, not accessible for testing, the manufacturer couldn't perform any further direct investigation.Despite several attempts to follow up on the reported event, the manufacturer was informed that no further information will be disclosed.As reported in the scientific literature, structural dysfunction is the major cause of failure of bioprosthetic heart valves and the principal underlying pathologic process is cuspal calcification.It is possible that the patient¿s clinical history and risk factors may have contributed to the structural valve deterioration observed in this perceval s valve.However, no information regarding the patient¿s clinical history was provided so this cannot ultimately be confirmed.As a further note, since no diagnostic images were shared with the manufacturer, it was not possible to assess if the perceval valve position was adequate to guarantee a normal functioning or if possible abnormal mechanical load and stress distribution on the prosthesis could have contributed to the early degeneration observed in this case.Ultimately, it should be noted that structural valve deterioration is listed as a possible adverse event in the perceval ifu.The event is, therefore, a known inherent risk of the device.
 
Event or Problem Description
The manufacturer was informed that a tavi was recently performed inside a perceval s size 25 prosthesis implanted in 2020.The manufacturer has followed up with the implanting surgeon to retrieve additional details on the event and the device involved but has been informed that no further information will be disclosed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PERCEVAL SUTURELESS AORTIC HEART VALVE
Common Device Name
TISSUE HEART VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORCYM CANADA CORP.
5005 north fraser way
burnaby, bc V5J 5 M1
CA  V5J 5M1
Manufacturer (Section G)
CORCYM CANADA CORP.
5005 north fraser way
burnaby, bc V5J 5 M1
CA   V5J 5M1
Manufacturer Contact
laura mannino
5005 north fraser way
burnaby, bc V5J 5-M1
CA   V5J 5M1
MDR Report Key20636426
Report Number3004478276-2024-00184
Device Sequence Number7369704
Product Code LWR
UDI-Device Identifier00896208000436
UDI-Public(01)00896208000436(240)ICV1210(17)240105
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryFR
PMA/510(K) Number
P150011
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2020
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 11/08/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/05/2024
Device Model NumberPVS25
Device Catalogue NumberICV1210
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/11/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/07/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured01/05/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age77 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-