|
SHANTOU INSTITUTE OF ULTRASONIC INSTRUMENTS CO.,LT SIUI APOGEE 2300 DIGITAL COLOR DOPPLER ULTRASOUND IMAGING SYSTEM; ULTRASONIC PULSED DOPPLER IMAGING SYSTEM
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
APOGEE 2300 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Perforation (2001)
|
| Date of Event |
10/02/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2024, a male patient underwent aquablation therapy for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (bph).Procept became aware that post aquablation therapy, the patient complained of pain.Upon inspection, the patient's abdomen was noted to be distended and computed tomography (ct) imaging with contract was performed, revealing a rectal perforation.On (b)(6) 2024, an exploratory laparotomy and subsequent bowel diversion procedure were performed.The patient remains hospitalized under observation and a discharge plan has not yet been determined.It was reported that no issues were experienced during the aquablation therapy, and the patient did not have anything unusual with his anatomy.No malfunction of the apogee 2300 digital color doppler ultrasound imaging system and associated component ecbp-1 trus probe were reported during this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Root cause of reported event has not yet been established.Investigation by manufacturer is currently in-process.Submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the manufacturer's product caused or contributed to the event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A review of the device history record (dhr) for apogee 2300 digital color doppler ultrasound imaging system (sn: (b)(6) ) and its component ecbp-1 endocavity biplane ultrasound probe related to the reported event was performed, which confirmed that there were no nonconformance, failures, discrepancies or missed steps during the manufacturing process that could be related to the reported event.The review indicated that the device met all design and manufacturing specifications when released for distribution.No similar complaint to the reported event was found after reviewing the post-marketing surveillance data of the device.The review of the operation manual for the apogee 2300 device (ifu) found that it has covered the related safety instruction: 1.6 safety.L) when performing the rectal ultrasound exam, be gentle in the movement.Do not perform violent operation, otherwise it may cause risks of perforation of the rectal wall, damage to the anus and perianal tissues, damage to the rectal mucosa or bleeding.In summary, the root cause for the reported event could not be determined.The user manual of the apogee 2300 device lists rectal perforation as a potential risk of the procedure.Based on the review of dhr, post-marketing data and ifu, the event is considered not to be device related.The information received determined that the rectal perforation was not related to the siui apogee 2300 device.Submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the manufacturer's products caused or contributed to the reported event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Based on the analysis of medical device reporting databases in regions such as china, australia and canada, as well as customer feedback data from markets where the apogee 2300 and ecbp-1 devices have been released, it can be concluded that there were no design defects in the apogee 2300 and ecbp-1 devices resulting in such incident; based on the review of the dhf of the medical devices with the sns reported in this incident, it can be confirmed that the corresponding apogee 2300 and ecbp-1 were in compliance with the product quality requirements.Furthermore, clear safety instructions have been provided in the ifu (operation manual), for example: "1.6 safety.L) when performing the rectal ultrasound exam, be gentle in the movement.Do not perform violent operation, otherwise it may cause risks of perforation of the rectal wall, damage to the anus and perianal tissues, damage to the rectal mucosa or bleeding." it can be determined that non-compliant clinical operation might be the primary cause of this incident.We will continue to remind operators to follow the instructions in the ifu (operation manual) when operating the devices, and we shall continue to monitor the situations in accordance with the requirements of the quality management system.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|