| Model Number |
21385500 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Product Quality Problem (1506); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/01/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Estimated date of incident on (b)(6) 2024.On 09oct2024, it was reported that the user's receiver had broken in the user's ear.He had been wearing it as normal, when it detached.The hearing care professional was able to remove the receiver.No harm to the user was reported.No further follow up is available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer's ref#: (b)(4).Manufacturer's investigation: technical investigation concluded: a dhr review have been completed.No deviation or changes were found during manufacturing of the device clinical conclusion: it has been reported that the user had a receiver break inside his ear.He had been wearing the hearing aid as normal, when he noticed that part of the receiver with the dome had detached.Hearing care professional was able to remove the receiver from his ear.There was no reported harm to the user following the incident.Clinical conclusion is that the detached receiver has not caused harm to the patient.The clinical evaluation for the device family does evaluate receivers coming loose in the ear canal.This is identified in the risk analysis and mitigated through device design by ensuring a sufficient pull force (compliance with iec 60601-2-66).The user guide states to contact the hcp if a foreign object or wax is located in the ear canal to reduce the potential risk of harm as far as possible.There are no new clinical aspects (e.G.Unforeseen use or clinical conditions) discovered from this event.Therefore, it is concluded that the current clinical evaluation and risk/benefit conclusions herein are sufficient.Risk assessment: risk related to mechanical damage are generally known mitigated and communicated to the user.All resulting actions are contained within the capa which includes an assessment of risks and associated updates.Trended case device investigation findings: adhesive failure mode is observed on failed devices.Adhesive to adherent interfaces detached from each other.Adhesive failure modes occur due to several factors such as inappropriate adhesive selection, pure surface preparation, and exposure to environmental factors.Assembly lines do not overlap totally but leave open gaps, creating pockets for ingress and retention of adhesion degrading media.Used adhesive technical sheet suggests avoiding adhesive usage in chlorinated environments - we have body contacts manufacturer's investigation is final.This is a combined (initial and final) report.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|