MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA AORTIC BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE

Model Number	3000TFX
Medical Device Problem Codes	Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Device Stenosis (4066)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes	Chest Pain (1776); Dyspnea (1816); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event	10/10/2024
Type of Reportable Event	Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: the device was not returned for evaluation, as it remains implanted.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through implant patient registry that a patient with a 27mm 3000tfx aortic valve, implanted in the pulmonic position, underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of eight (8) years and eight (8) months due to unknown reason.The tpvr was performed with a 26mm 9755rsl transcatheter valve.The patient was in recovery post procedure.Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional "customer complaint".The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: updated: b4, b5, b7, g3, g6, h2, h6 (component code, clinical code, device code, type of investigation, investigation findings, investigation conclusions).Based on the information available, the device was intentionally used outside the way it was designed and intended.The performance, safety, efficacy, longevity, and durability of rings and bioprosthetic valves have not been determined when the product is used outside the scope of its intended use and/or its studied population.Stenosis, which develops progressively over time, can be due to a number of issues.Additionally, there can be a number of potential known and unknown patient-related contributing factors.Structural valve deterioration (svd) is the most common reason for bio prosthesis explant and encompasses multiple failure modes, including calcification, non-calcific degeneration, dehiscence, cusp thickening or fibrosis, or a combination of these.Alternatively, non-structural valve dysfunction (nsvd) may also play a role in the development of valvular stenosis.Stenosis is most commonly related to patient factors and is not usually an indication of a device malfunction related to a manufacturing deficiency.The instructions for use (ifu) have been reviewed, and no inadequacies have been identified with regard to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.The reported type of event is included in the ifu.There is no allegation of a malfunction which could be related to a manufacturing non-conformance and/or one was not suspected or confirmed through investigation; no labeling non-conformance/deficiency; no use-related issue with a hazardous situation; no device-related infection; and no evidence of a product failure with regard to design, reliability, or use error.The most likely cause is patient factors, including congenital heart disease.The device history record (dhr) review was completed and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through implant patient registry that a patient with a 27mm 3000tfx aortic valve, implanted in the pulmonic position, underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of eight (8) years and eight (8) months due to stenosis.The patient presented with shortness of breath and chest pain.The tpvr was performed with a 26mm 9755rsl transcatheter valve.The patient was stable post procedure and discharged on pod #1.

• Brand Name: CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA AORTIC BIOPROSTHESIS
• Common Device Name: REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE
• Manufacturer (Section D): EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES; 1 edwards way; irvine CA 92614
• Manufacturer (Section G): EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, LLC; 1 edwards way; irvine CA 92614
• Manufacturer Contact: saurav singh ; 1 edwards way; mle fl2- office m2013; irvine, CA 92614 ; 9492506615
• MDR Report Key: 20649142
• Report Number: 2015691-2024-08499
• Device Sequence Number: 21077602
• Product Code: DYE
• UDI-Device Identifier: 00690103163674
• UDI-Public: (01)00690103163674(17)190624
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter State: OR
• Initial Reporter Country: US
• PMA/510(K) Number: P860057
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Device Implanted Year: 2016
• Serviced by Third Party (Y/N): Unknown
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: Other,Health Professional
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Physician
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 12/10/2024

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Expiration Date: 06/24/2019
• Device Model Number: 3000TFX
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Is the Reporter a Health Professional?: Yes
• Was the Report Sent to FDA?: No
• Type of Report(Section G): Thirty-Day
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 10/17/2024
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: 11/15/2024
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 11/10/2024
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 12/10/2024
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): No
• Date Device Manufactured: 06/25/2015
• Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N): Yes
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event: Life Threatening; Hospitalization; Required Intervention
• Patient Age: 26 YR
• Patient Sex: Male