|
|
| Catalog Number |
5954680 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Abdominal Pain (1685); Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240)
|
| Date of Event |
10/01/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Based on the information received, no conclusions can be made.Per medical records review, about 1 year 6 months post implant of ventralight st mesh, patient was diagnosed with hernia recurrence, adhesions and abdominal pain thereby underwent repair with removal of mesh.The instructions-for-use supplied with the device lists hernia recurrence, pain and adhesions as possible complications.Review of manufacturing records confirms product was manufactured to specification.This emdr represents the ventralight st mesh (device #2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the ventralex st (device #1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Addendum per information provided: on (b)(6) 2016: patient was diagnosed with epigastric hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventralex st (device #1).Per operative notes, "herniated preperitoneal fat was immediately encountered and reduced.A 6.4 cm ventralex st mesh (device #1) was placed." on (b)(6) 2017: patient was diagnosed with recurrent intra-abdominal wall hernia and abdominal pain thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of ventralight st mesh (device #2).Per operative notes, "there were omental adhesions attached to the previously placed mesh which were dissected away.It appeared the previously placed mesh had partially migrated from its original position.The mesh was left in place.A piece of ventralight st mesh (device #2) was placed overlap of the repair." on (b)(6) 2018: patient underwent revision surgery with repair of recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with removal of mesh.Per operative notes, "midline incision was made and carried down to defect and previously placed mesh.Mesh was densely adherent to underlying omentum.The omentum adherent to the mesh was then resected.The synthetic mesh was secured to posterior fascia superiorly and inferiorly." attorney alleges that the patient had adhesions, mesh migration, infection, pain, hernia recurrence, and emotional injuries.It is also alleged that the patient had surgery on (b)(6) 2017 to repair the recurrent hernia.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|