|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H11 additional narrative: the photo investigation revealed that 4.5 healix advance peek w/cord anchor was broken at the arthroscopic space.Just a part of the broken anchor was observed along a segment of the suture.No other anomalies could be observed.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of 4.5 healix advance peek w/cord would contribute to the complained device issue.¿ based on the investigation findings, the potential cause for the broken anchor can be traced to off axis insertion and levering during insertion.As per ifu- 100191 inserting the awl or drill to less than the specified depth, axial misalignment or levering with the anchor upon insertion may result in anchor fracture, and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
|