|
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. REDAPT TRIAL BODY SZ 12-15; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/POLYMER, CEMENTED OR NON-POROUS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
71354631 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/22/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).This complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a product problem associated with a smith+nephew device.The reported problem relates to known inherent device and/or procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are conservatively submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, during a thr surgery, when removing the trial components with the hook after impaction, the body of one (1) redapt trial body sz 12-15 disconnected, and the wave spring popped out falling into the surgical table.The procedure was resumed without delay using a smith and nephew backup device, and no injuries were reported as a result.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section h10: the associated device was returned and evaluated.The visual inspection revealed that the wave spring came apart from the device.The wave spring was returned.The device shows signs of extensive wear and use.This inspection was conducted by naked eye.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that the provided photos and x-rays do not aid in the investigation as the reported event happened outside of the patient's body.Therefore, there were no clinical factors found that would indicate a clinical root cause of the broken instrument.The procedure was resumed without delay using a smith and nephew backup device.No patient injuries were reported.No further medical investigation is warranted at this time.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.This device is a reusable instrument that can be exposed to numerous surgeries.Damage from prolonged use, misuse or rough handling are likely potential factors that could contribute to the reported event.We recommend that all reusable instruments be routinely inspected for wear and damage and replaced as necessary.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.Internal complaint reference: case (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|