|
(b)(4).Date sent 11/12/2024.D4 batch # 331a05.B3 exact date is unk.Assumed first day of the month.Investigation summary: the product was returned for evaluation.Visual inspection was conducted on the return reload.Visual analysis of the returned sample determined that the 6r45b reload was received with no apparent damage and partially fired 1/10 and with the reload lock out damaged.No functional test could be performed due to the condition of the reload.The event reported was confirmed and it is related to improper use of the reload.The damage to the reload lockout spring is consistent with damage observed when the firing cycle is started, interrupted, released, and restarted.When firing the device make sure that the firing stroke is completed.Do not partially fire the device.Fire the device by squeezing the firing trigger completely until it rests on the closing trigger.Once the firing cycle has been initiated, it must be completed.If the re-initiation of firing is resumed, the device will lockout.Firing through the lockout mechanism will break the device.Please reference the instruction for use for more information.As part of ethicon endo surgery¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch 331a05, and no non-conformances related to the reported complaint condition were identified.The manufacturing records were reviewed and the manufacturing/packaging criteria were met prior to the release of this lot.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: please confirm when the event occurred (intra op or post op)? how was the issue addressed? please provide more details about the "perforated esophagus".Did the device staple? if yes, was the staple line complete (full length)? did the device cut the tissue? was the device locked on tissue with the jaws closed? if yes, what steps were taken to open the jaws? if the jaws could not be opened, how was the device removed? is the current patient status known? was there any patient consequence or change in the post-operative care of the patient as a result of the event? additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: was the firing sequence started but not completed? if yes: yes.Did the device deliver any staples? yes, partial fire.If yes, were the staples formed properly? no.If yes, was the staple line complete? no.Did the device cut? no.If yes, was the cut line complete? if yes, was there any issue with the cut line? was there any difficulty opening the device jaws? yes, rigid.
|
|
It was reported that during an ent pharyngeal pouch the patient has perforated esophagus ¿back in (b)(6) 2024 we carried out a pharyngeal pouch stapling using the endo path ets45 3.5mm staples.However, on this occasion there has been an incident, where the patient suffered a perforated esophagus¿.
|