• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS US. CORP TEMPO; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS US. CORP TEMPO; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 451531H0
Medical Device Problem Codes Crack (1135); Degraded (1153)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/24/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for analysis, but the engineering report is not yet available.However, it will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, the four 5f tempo sim2 contrast catheters had cracks.The cracks were located on the body of the catheter, which were noticed during preparation.The issue was discovered when opening the packaging.The procedure was completed by changing to another tempo device.There was no reported injury to the patient.There was no damage to the packaging of the device.The product was stored hanging in the disposable's cabinet.The device was prepped per the ifu, but it was not used.The access site was femoral, and the intended procedure targeted carotid artery stenosis.The lesion was little calcified, with no vessel tortuosity noted.The device will be returned for evaluation.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for analysis, but the engineering report is not yet available.However, it will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, the four 5f tempo sim2 contrast catheters had cracks.The cracks were located on the body of the catheter, which were noticed during preparation.The issue was discovered when opening the packaging.The procedure was completed by changing to another tempo device.There was no reported injury to the patient.There was no damage to the packaging of the device.The product was stored hanging in the disposable's cabinet.The device was prepped per the ifu, but it was not used.The access site was femoral, and the intended procedure targeted carotid artery stenosis.The lesion was little calcified, with no vessel tortuosity noted.These devices were no exposed to any uv light during the procedure.These devices were no exposed to high temperatures.It is unknown if the devices came from the same box.The device will be returned for evaluation.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, the four 5f tempo sim2 contrast catheters had cracks.The cracks were located on the body of the catheter, which were noticed during preparation.The issue was discovered when opening the packaging.The catheters were found to have degradation.The procedure was completed by changing to another tempo device.There was no reported injury to the patient.There was no damage to the packaging of the device.The product was stored hanging in the disposable's cabinet.The device was prepped per the ifu, but it was not used.The access site was femoral, and the intended procedure targeted carotid artery stenosis.The lesion was little calcified, with no vessel tortuosity noted.These devices were no exposed to any uv light during the procedure.These devices were no exposed to high temperatures.It is unknown if the devices came from the same box.The device will be returned for evaluation.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
As reported, the four 5f tempo sim2 contrast catheters had cracks.The cracks were located on the body of the catheter, which were noticed during preparation.The issue was discovered when opening the packaging.The catheters were found to have degradation.The procedure was completed by changing to another tempo device.There was no reported injury to the patient.There was no damage to the packaging of the device.The product was stored hanging in the disposable's cabinet.The device was prepped per the ifu, but it was not used.The access site was femoral, and the intended procedure targeted carotid artery stenosis.The lesion was little calcified, with no vessel tortuosity noted.These devices were not exposed to any uv light during the procedure.These devices were not exposed to high temperatures.It is unknown if the devices came from the same box.One non-sterile "cath tempo 5f sim 2 100cm" unit was received for analysis.During the visual inspection, severe cracks and an irregular texture were noted along the catheter body, and a different coloration of the catheter hub was seen.No other anomalies were found during the visual analysis.Dimensional analysis could not be performed on the returned device due to the severely cracked condition and irregular texture cracks seen in the catheter body.The microscopic examination involved capturing amplified images of the catheter and presented evidence of a severely cracked condition, micro-elongations, micro fissures, and an irregular texture on the plastic of the catheter body.Additionally, the returned device was compared to a lab sample diagnostic catheter and a yellowish color was seen on the hub of the returned device.It should also be noted that no signs of mechanical stress such as damage to the braid wire were seen during the analysis.No other anomalies were found during the microscopic analysis.The complaint reported by the customer as catheter (body/shaft)-cracked and catheter (body/shaft)-degradation were confirmed.Visual and microscopic inspection revealed a severely cracked condition, micro elongations, micro fissures, and irregular texture.Additionally, a yellowish discoloration was seen on the hub of the returned device in comparison to a lab sample catheter.These findings along with the absence of mechanical stress suggest the malfunctions may be secondary to environmental exposure such as uv radiation, thermal stress, or chemical agents however, the root cause has not been conclusively determined.Users are trained to inspect for signs of damage prior to and during use.Any product with damage is not to be used.Information for safety is provided in the products labeling with the intent to make the user aware of the risks.According to the instructions for use (ifu), although not intended as a mitigation of risk, ¿store in a cool, dark, dry place.Do not use if package is open or damaged.¿ based on the available information and product analysis, the cause of the degradation could not be determined; however, it is potentially related to the manufacturing process of the unit.Therefore, an investigation has been initiated to further review the potential causes.No further action will be taken at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TEMPO
Common Device Name
CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS US. CORP
14201 nw 60 avenue
miami lakes FL 33014
Manufacturer (Section G)
CORDIS US CORP.
14201 nw 60 avenue
miami lakes FL 33014
Manufacturer Contact
karla castro
santiago troncoso 808
juarez, chihuahua 
7863138372
MDR Report Key20704214
Report Number9616099-2024-00405
Device Sequence Number21242146
Product Code DQO
UDI-Device Identifier10705032008587
UDI-Public(01)10705032008587(17)250630(10)18131631
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K973401
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/26/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Expiration Date06/30/2025
Device Catalogue Number451531H0
Device Lot Number18131631
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/01/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/14/2025
02/12/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/18/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/07/2025
02/26/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/29/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
UNKNOWN.
Patient SexUnknown
-
-