• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPICC SOLO CATHETER 4F FULL TRAY WITH MICROINTRODUCER (SINGLE-LUMEN); CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, THERAPEUTIC, LONG-TERM GREATER THAN 30 DAYS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPICC SOLO CATHETER 4F FULL TRAY WITH MICROINTRODUCER (SINGLE-LUMEN); CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, THERAPEUTIC, LONG-TERM GREATER THAN 30 DAYS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 3194108
Medical Device Problem Code Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/15/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The manufacturer has received the sample and is pending evaluation.A supplemental will be submitted with evaluation results.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2024 i placed a powerpicc solo catheter.On (b)(4) 2024 i was called to the infusion department because the picc line was leaking.I took the dressing off and pulled the picc as i flushed it and found 2 cracks in the picc about 5cm up from the hub.The patient said his arm felt full after his last infusion.The picc line was removed and i placed a 2.25 midline in the patient so he could receive his treatment.The following day i placed another picc line in the opposite arm.No other information provided, at this time.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The complaint of a damaged catheter was confirmed.The product returned for evaluation was one 4fr single lumen powerpicc solo.The investigation findings are consistent with damage accumulated through flexural fatigue.Flexural fatigue may occur due to cyclic kinking of the catheter tube in which physiological, placement, usage, and mechanical factors may gradually form a crack(s) in the catheter.The returned product sample was evaluated and two splits were observed between the 4cm and 6cm depth markings.The catheter splits contained physical features associated with material fatigue, and the characteristics observed which supported this type of failure included: damage which was circumferentially aligned.Fracture edges which were rounded and polished due to repeated material wear.'c' shaped impressions leading into the fracture sites which are consistent with material buckling due to movement which caused the fracture edges to be pressed together.Overall elliptical shape to the fracture cross-section (a result of repeated kinking of the tubing).Repetitive kinking of the indwelling catheter appears to have contributed to the observed leak; however, the specific circumstances surrounding how kinking developed into a fracture within the catheter tubing were ultimately unknown.An examination of the catheter structure revealed no potential damage/defect related to manufacture of the product.The damage location suggested that catheter securement, access and maintenance techniques may have contributed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2024 i placed a powerpicc solo catheter.On (b)(6) 2024 i was called to the infusion department because the picc line was leaking.I took the dressing off and pulled the picc as i flushed it and found 2 cracks in the picc about 5cm up from the hub.The patient said his arm felt full after his last infusion.The picc line was removed and i placed a 2.25 midline in the patient so he could receive his treatment.The following day i placed another picc line in the opposite arm.No other information provided, at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POWERPICC SOLO CATHETER 4F FULL TRAY WITH MICROINTRODUCER (SINGLE-LUMEN)
Common Device Name
CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, THERAPEUTIC, LONG-TERM GREATER THAN 30 DAYS
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
shelly gilbert
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
8015950700
MDR Report Key20708902
Report Number3006260740-2024-06706
Device Sequence Number18195559
Product Code LJS
UDI-Device Identifier00801741027710
UDI-Public(01)00801741027710(11)231002(17)250131(10)REHV2244
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateWI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K072230
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/27/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/31/2025
Device Catalogue Number3194108
Device Lot NumberREHV2244
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/04/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/22/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/27/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/18/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/21/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/01/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-