• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPICC 4F SL MAX BARRIER PLUS KIT W/BIOPATCH & PROBE COVER; CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,LONG-TERM GREATER THAN 30 DAYS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPICC 4F SL MAX BARRIER PLUS KIT W/BIOPATCH & PROBE COVER; CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,LONG-TERM GREATER THAN 30 DAYS Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Medical Device Problem Code Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Pain (1994)
Date of Event 10/22/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The manufacturer has received the sample and it will be evaluated.A supplemental will be submitted with evaluation results.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported by the customer that oncology patient came in for lab draws but nurses were unable to draw out of patients picc line.Called for vat consult who was also unsuccessful.Patient was also complaining of pain so picc was removed.Upon removal the picc was fractured around the 5cm mark.Additional information received 10/24/2024: it was reported there were no negative clinical impact on the patient, other than losing central access while still needed for outpatient chemo treatments.No injury or adverse event to patient or healthcare worker.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The complaint of a damaged catheter was confirmed.The product returned for evaluation was one 4 fr single lumen powerpicc.The investigation findings are consistent with damage accumulated through flexural fatigue.Flexural fatigue may occur due to cyclic kinking of the catheter tube in which physiological, placement, usage, and mechanical factors may gradually form a crack(s) in the catheter.The returned product sample was evaluated, and a split was observed between the 3 cm and 4 cm depth markers.The catheter split contained physical features associated with material fatigue, and the characteristics observed which supported this type of failure included: damage which was circumferentially aligned.Fracture edges which were rounded and polished due to repeated material wear.'c' shaped impressions leading into the fracture site which are consistent with material buckling due to movement which caused the fracture edges to be pressed together.Overall elliptical shape to the fracture cross-section (a result of repeated kinking of the tubing).Repetitive kinking of the indwelling catheter appears to have contributed to the observed leak; however, the specific circumstances surrounding how kinking developed into a fracture within the catheter tubing were ultimately unknown.An examination of the catheter structure revealed no potential damage/defect related to manufacture of the product.The damage location suggested that catheter securement, access, and maintenance techniques may have contributed.This complaint will be recorded for future trending and monitoring purposes.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported by the customer that oncology patient came in for lab draws but nurses were unable to draw out of patients picc line.Called for vat consult who was also unsuccessful.Patient was also complaining of pain so picc was removed.Upon removal the picc was fractured around the 5cm mark.Additional information received 10/24/2024: it was reported there were no negative clinical impact on the patient, other than losing central access while still needed for outpatient chemo treatments.No injury or adverse event to patient or healthcare worker.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POWERPICC 4F SL MAX BARRIER PLUS KIT W/BIOPATCH & PROBE COVER
Common Device Name
CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,LONG-TERM GREATER THAN 30 DAYS
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
kayla bevins
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
8015950700
MDR Report Key20727619
Report Number3006260740-2024-06769
Device Sequence Number21080024
Product Code LJS
UDI-Device Identifier00801741155048
UDI-Public(01)00801741155048(11)240617(17)250630(10)REJR2563
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNC
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K070996
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/23/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2025
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number1174108D4
Device Lot NumberREJR2563
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/30/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/22/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/30/2025
04/24/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/19/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/20/2025
05/23/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/01/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
If action reported to FDA under 21 USC 360i(g), list
FDA-assigned Recall Number or include a statement
MDS-24-5154-C
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-