|
|
| Model Number |
AH660HS |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Contamination (1120); Degraded (1153)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Asthma (1726); Headache (1880); Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907); Nausea (1970); Vomiting (2144); Dizziness (2194); Respiratory Tract Infection (2420); Unspecified Respiratory Problem (4464); Eye Irritation (4803)
|
| Date of Event |
10/09/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The manufacturer was contacted in reference to the voluntary field safety notice/recall notification related to the sound abatement foam in certain cpap, bipap, and mechanical ventilator devices.The manufacturer received information alleging an issue related to a cpap device's sound abatement foam.The patient has alleged eye irritation, nose irritation, respiratory tract irritation, dizziness and/or headache, hypersensitivity and nausea / vomiting, asthma.Medical intervention was not specified.No additional information can be requested at this time.The manufacturer was made aware of this complaint through a representative of the customer.At this time, no further investigation can be performed.If any additional information is received, a follow up report will be filed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Added device information on box d.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The manufacturer was contacted in reference to the voluntary field safety notice/recall notification related to the sound abatement foam in certain cpap, bipap, and mechanical ventilator devices.The manufacturer received information alleging an issue related to a cpap device's sound abatement foam.The patient has alleged eye irritation, nose irritation, respiratory tract irritation, dizziness and/or headache, hypersensitivity and nausea / vomiting, asthma.Medical intervention was not specified.No additional information can be requested at this time.During the evaluation of the device at the third-party service center, the device was visually inspected and found no evidence of foam degradation during the evaluation, the device powered on and air flow was confirmed.The device's downloaded logs were reviewed by the third-party service center.There was two error code found.During evaluation there was secondary findings and dust was observed.The third-party service center concludes that they couldn't confirm the customer's allegation and there was no visible foam degradation and unit got corrected.Box h: evaluation method code, evaluation results code, component code grid and conclusion code grid has been updated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|