| Catalog Number |
74121146 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Periprosthetic fracture (4902)
|
| Date of Event |
04/20/2007
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).This complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a reported patient complication that includes reference to the use of a smith+nephew product without evidence of a specific product problem.The reported complication relates to known inherent procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to confirm a relationship between the reported event and the device or identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are conservatively submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that after undergoing a bhr resurfacing in his left hip joint on (b)(6) 2007, the patient sustained a left femoral neck fracture that required a conversion to tha on (b)(6) 2007.The resulting system included a traditional femoral stem, bhr cup, and modular cobalt-chromium femoral head.No further information is available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.As no device part and batch numbers were provided for investigation, a complaint history review, manufacturing record review, or escalation actions review could not be performed.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.The review of the product's current ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.Due to insufficient information, it is not possible to determine a revision of the risk associated to the alleged device.No further actions are required at this time.The available medical documents were reviewed.The adverse event was likely caused partially or wholly by the user of the product.Patient nonadherence to the post-operative plan of care cannot be ruled out as the likely clinical root cause of the femoral neck fracture.The root cause can likely be ascribed to patient nonadherence to the post-operative plan of care.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: d4 (lot number, unique identifier (udi) #).Corrected data: d1, d4 (catalog number), d10.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Fda recall - z-2746-2015 ¿ acetabular cups.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.A review of the historical complaints data for the alleged devices was performed using batch numbers, part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.Similar complaints have been identified for the head.No similar complaints have been identified for the cup.This failure will continue to be monitored via routine trending.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All released devices involved met manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.The review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, prior applicable escalation actions were identified and confirmed to reduce associated risks as far as possible.No further escalation actions are required.The available medical documents were reviewed.The adverse event was likely caused partially or wholly by the user of the product.Patient nonadherence to the post-operative plan of care cannot be ruled out as the likely clinical root cause of the femoral neck fracture.The root cause can likely be ascribed to patient nonadherence to the post-operative plan of care.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|