• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU150
Medical Device Problem Code Unstable (1667)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Visual Impairment (2138); Visual Disturbances (2140); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a2 and a3b: unknown/ asked but not available.Section b3: date of event: unknown.Section h3: other 81: the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that there was plan of explant of preloaded intraocular lens (iol).From additional information it was learnt that the patient complained of diplopia after implantation of the lens.The lens was multifactorial.The axis of lens was off by a few degrees, lens target power was slightly off target.Patient feels better with exchange of lens.Lens alignment was off during the implantation of the lens.The lens was 20 degrees off axis.The lens did not have other issues.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 12/18/2024 section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes device evaluation: visual inspection was performed on the suspect product and found the lens was received cut into four pieces and a haptic was cut.Due to the returned condition no further evaluation could be performed.Conclusion: the complaint issue "rotation" was not identified during product evaluation.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key20738667
Report Number3012236936-2024-000308
Device Sequence Number8377637
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474746589
UDI-Public(01)05050474746589(17)270108
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/13/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDIU150
Device Catalogue NumberDIU150U220
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 10/30/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/20/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/20/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/13/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/08/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-