• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO EEA; STAPLER, SURGICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO EEA; STAPLER, SURGICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number EEA2535
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/06/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
According to the reporter during the thoracoscopic esophageal malignant tumor surgery, when on esophageal anastomosis (esophagojejunostomy), it was found that some parts of the anvil appeared to have been damaged.Treatment intervention was not performed.There was no patient injury.
 
Event or Problem Description
According to the reporter, during the thoracoscopic esophageal malignant tumor surgery, when on esophageal anastomosis (esophagojejunostomy), it was found that the anvil got broken and the anvil portion of the device either partially or fully detached from the rest of the device.As the breakage occurred after the anastomosis was completed, no medical intervention was performed and the surgery was completed.There was no patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: b5, g3, h6 (rfr, fdd).Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted that the anvil of the instrument was observed to be separated from the instrument.Further inspection of the anvil cutting ring showed deep traces of knife impression and the ring was received completely severed.The anvil plunger was disengaged and broken.It was reported that the instrument broke and the anvil was disengaged.The reported issues were confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.This issue may occur due to forcing the closure of the instrument after firing forcing the anvil to its original position damaging the anvil.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.The instructions included with this device provide the following guidance: prior to attaching the anvil to the instrument, verify that the instrument integrated trocar has advanced fully through the tissue and that the orange band is visible.If the orange band is not visible, proper assembly of the instrument and anvil may be compromised.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EEA
Common Device Name
STAPLER, SURGICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO
201 sabanetas industrial park
ponce PR 00716 4401
Manufacturer (Section G)
US SURGICAL PUERTO RICO
201 sabanetas industrial park
ponce PR 00716 4401
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key20757847
Report Number2647580-2024-04905
Device Sequence Number8587759
Product Code GAG
UDI-Device Identifier10884523004748
UDI-Public10884523004748
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K221003
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/30/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/31/2025
Device Model NumberEEA2535
Device Catalogue NumberEEA2535
Device Lot NumberP4B1020FR
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/18/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/06/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/18/2024
01/21/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/22/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/26/2024
01/30/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/14/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-