|
On (b)(6) 2024-lk unt-2024-028693 co-suspect medication unspecified dressing was updated to hydro seal dressing.Additional co-suspect included: unspecified soap wipe (ethanol, soft soap).It was reported that the patient had a terrible rash around the outside of the central line dressing, where hydro seal 5x5 borders were present.The rash was present at the hydro seal borders beneath and to her flank and down toward her right side to where pant waist present (previously reported dermatitis contact).She tried a soap wipe at those same locations and thought that this might have been caused by that product as well, as she was unable to wash off that residue.She went to an urgent care clinic recently, and they [in hospital] told her it was due to hydro seal.She used steroid cream [unspecified] and tried different tapes to secure the hydro seal dressing.
|
|
H3 product is not available for return or evaluation.Therefore, this report is based solely on the information provided by the reporter.A review of the complaint database revealed there was one similar event for a incident involving a skin reaction to adhesive in the past 2 years.In the case description provided by united therapeutics, it is suspected that in addition to the product's adhesive, other factors may have contributed to the irritation of the patient's skin.On an unreported date, the patient's iv tubing got caught on the door handle and the tubing got disconnected and blood was coming from the line.Co-suspect medication included: unspecified dressing was used on an unreported date in 2024, it was reported that patient had bumps under dressing part that had spread outside of dressing that were itchy and had a burning sensation and were red.Co-suspect: unspecified soap wipe (ethanol, soft soap).It was reported that the patient had a terrible rash around the outside of the central line dressing, where the hydro seal 5x5 borders were present.The rash was present at the hydro seal borders beneath and to her flank and down toward her right side to where pant waist present (previously reported dermatitis contact).She tried a soap wipe at those same locations and thought that this might have been caused by that product as well, as she was unable to wash off that residue.She went to an urgent care clinic recently, and they told her it was due to hydro seal.She used steroid cream (unspecified) and tried different tapes to secure the hydro seal dressing.Co-suspect: aquaguard dressing.The patient had a skin rash (previously reported, dermatitis contact), possibly allergic reaction to hydroseal dressing.She switched to aquaguard dressing and the rash spread.Contact with aquaguard dressing was considered to be possibly related.The instructions for use appear to be adequate with instructions for single use, removal, and discontinuation of use if sensitivity or irritation occurs.At this time there is no evidence that a manufacturing non-conformity contributed to the reported complaint, and the instructions for use were reviewed and determined to provide adequate instructions and warnings for the safe and effective use of the device.Therefore, no corrective or preventative actions are necessary.All complaints are trended and reviewed by management on a monthly basis.As part of this monthly review, any excursion above the control limits for this failure mode will be assessed, documented, and acted upon as warranted.Reference complaint file (b)(4).
|