|
As reported, during an unspecified procedure, an open-end ureteral catheter "broke." no section of the device remained inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.The complainant has not reported any adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence.Additional information has been requested regarding the patient and the event.At the time of this report, no further information has been provided.
|
|
Investigation ¿ evaluation it was reported that a patient of undisclosed gender and age underwent an unspecified procedure in which the open-end ureteral catheter broke during surgery.Per the surgery nurse, the patient had "no issues" due to this occurrence.Reviews of documentation including the complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu), and quality control procedures for the device were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned; therefore, no physical examinations could be performed.However, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the dhr for the reported complaint device lot recorded no nonconformances.A database search did not identify any other events associated with the reported device lot.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The device is supplied with ifu t_urecat_rev1 which includes the following: "precautions ¿ if you encounter resistance while advancing or withdrawing the catheter, stop.Determine the cause of the resistance before proceeding." the evidence from the complaint file, dhr, complaint history and quality control documents indicates that the complaint device was manufactured to specification as well as other items in the lot or similar devices in the field or in house.Based on the available information, no product returned, and the results of the investigation, a definitive root cause was unable to be established.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the associated risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned or that a death or serious injury occurred; nor is it admission that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|