|
|
| Model Number |
8888145039P |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/29/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, on commencement of photopheresis treatment, when the clinician withdrew the catheter lock, air and blood entered the syringe.Upon closer inspection, a crack was observed in the blue (venous lumen) luer.The affected catheter had been inserted into the patient for about 430 days before the issue occurred.There were no other damages found on the product where the crack was observed.Besides the reported issue, there were no other defects found on the product at the time of the event.There was no leak.The catheter was not repaired.Tego was utilized, and the cleaning agents used on the product were briemark alcohol wipes, and the skin surrounding the catheter was cleaned with n/saline or chloroprep.The cleaning agents were allowed to dry thoroughly prior to applying ointments to the area.The insertion site was treated prior to product placement.There was no instrument used to loosen or tighten the device.The products being utilized were competitors brands of apheresis kits, ecp (extracorporeal photopheresis kits), and luer lock syringes.The extension was immediately clamped and capped with a bd bung (cap) and was not used.The incident was reported to interventional radiology.Treatment was completed through the red (arterial lumen).The affected catheter needed to be replaced and was explanted two days after the date of the event, and a new catheter with a different lot was implanted on the same day it was explanted.There was no need for any medical intervention, including prophylactic antibiotics.There was no blood loss, and blood transfusion was not performed.There were no complications with the replacement procedure.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: d9, g3, h3, h6.H3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted the luer adapter to be cracked, leaking, or broken.It was reported that the luer adapter was leaking, cracked or broken.The reported issue was confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|