• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC FLEXOR RAABE GUIDING SHEATH; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC FLEXOR RAABE GUIDING SHEATH; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number G12242
Medical Device Problem Code Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/06/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
As reported, during set up for an unknown procedure, a flexor raabe guiding sheath's hub separated while attempting to shape the device.There was no harm to any patient as this occurred before the patient entered the room.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Summary of event: as reported, during set up for an unknown procedure, a flexor raabe guiding sheath's hub separated while attempting to shape the device.There was no harm to any patient as this occurred before the patient entered the room.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection of the complaint device was also conducted.The complaint device was returned to cook for investigation.Physical examination of the returned device showed the device was received with the dilator inside the sheath.The flare had pulled free from the hub of the sheath and there was no shaft material noted to be left in the hub.It was noted that the flare appeared to be smaller than normal.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device history record found no relevant non-conformances on the lot.A review of complaint history found no additional complaints for this lot number.Cook investigated all lots manufactured by the same personnel within the same time as the complaint lot and found no relevant complaints have been reported from the field for the same failure mode.The product ifu warns, ¿do not attempt to heat or reshape the device.¿ a review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, ifu, and investigation of the returned device suggests that there is evidence the device was manufactured out of specification; however, cook has concluded that this is an isolated incident.There is no evidence of additional non-conforming devices in-house or in the field.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded manufacturing deficiency contributed to this incident.The customer states they were trying to shape the device during prep; however, it is unknown which part of the sheath.The ifu states, ¿do not attempt to heat or reshape the device¿.Cook has determined the handling force during prep would not have been enough to cause the flare to pull free.Higher forces would be applied on the hub during use/removal.It was determined the undersized flare is the cause of the device failure.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FLEXOR RAABE GUIDING SHEATH
Common Device Name
DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key20793206
Report Number1820334-2024-01557
Device Sequence Number15161700
Product Code DYB
UDI-Device Identifier00827002122420
UDI-Public(01)00827002122420(17)270828(10)16227843
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K142829
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/14/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberG12242
Device Catalogue NumberKCFW-8.0-38-55-RB-RAABE
Device Lot Number16227843
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/18/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/23/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/27/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/14/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/28/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-