|
As reported, upon removing one 8f 11cm avanti + catheter sheath introducer, 3/4 of the proximal sheath was removed from the artery, but the remaining 1/4 of the distal sheath had separated completely and remained in the femoral artery.A vascular surgeon attended and used a long mustang balloon to snare and retrieve the broken distal tip of the sheath without adverse effects.The other avanti + sheath was removed without issue.The patient was unharmed.There were no reports of patient injury.The two 8f avanti sheaths were inserted into the femoral arteries during an electrophysiological cardiology procedure.The nurse unit manager communicated it is possible the second doctor nicked the sheath with the scalpel, and a call was placed to confirm what his usual practice is.During the procedure, only one sheath malfunctioned.There were no damages found on the device packaging prior to opening.The device was stored and prepped in accordance with the instructions for use (ifu).A contralateral approach was not used.The patient was a thin female with very tough fascia, making access difficult.The surgeon kinked the sheath during access and did not use mosquito forceps to create a wider tissue track for easier insertion.The device was flushed prior to use, and the vessel dilator was snapped into place at the hub.Difficulties were encountered during the insertion process due to the tough fascia and kinked sheath, and during the withdrawal process, the kinked sheath part reportedly caught during sheath exchange.The patient recovered overnight with no adverse effects.The patient has since been discharged.Two devices will be returned for evaluation.Four images were received.
|
|
Complaint conclusion: as reported, upon removing one 8f 11cm avanti + catheter sheath introducer, 3/4 of the proximal sheath was removed from the artery, but the remaining 1/4 of the distal sheath had separated completely and remained in the femoral artery.A vascular surgeon attended and used a long mustang balloon to snare and retrieve the broken distal tip of the sheath without adverse effects.The other avanti + sheath was removed without issue.The patient was unharmed.There were no reports of patient injury.The two 8f avanti sheaths were inserted into the femoral arteries during an electrophysiological cardiology procedure.The nurse unit manager communicated it is possible the second doctor nicked the sheath with the scalpel, and a call was placed to confirm what his usual practice is.During the procedure, only one sheath malfunctioned.There were no damages found on the device packaging prior to opening.The device was stored and prepped in accordance with the instructions for use (ifu).A contralateral approach was not used.The patient was a thin female with very tough fascia, making access difficult.The surgeon kinked the sheath during access and did not use mosquito forceps to create a wider tissue track for easier insertion.The device was flushed prior to use, and the vessel dilator was snapped into place at the hub.Difficulties were encountered during the insertion process due to the tough fascia and kinked sheath, and during the withdrawal process, the kinked sheath part reportedly caught during sheath exchange.The patient recovered overnight with no adverse effects.The patient has since been discharged.Four pictures related to the reported failure, ¿catheter sheath introducer (csi)~ separated,¿ were sent for review.In the first picture, 13 outer boxes of avanti 8f with catalog number 504608x can be seen.The second picture shows a csi 8f with the cannula separated on top of a blue cloth, with an unknown device inserted into the separated cannula section.The third picture provides a different viewing angle of the csi 8f with the cannula separated.The fourth photo captures two doctors during a surgical intervention, with one of the doctors holding the separated cannula segment with an unknown device inserted.No other outstanding details are observed in the attached pictures.Additionally, sixty-three (unused si avanti+ 8f std w/gw no obt devices, all from the same lot (18126656) and catalog number (504608x), were received for evaluation.These devices were returned in their sealed inner packages and original box.According to the ansi/asq standard z1.4, the sample size was determined to be 8 units.During the visual inspection, no damages/anomalies that may have contributed to the reported failure were seen while inspecting these devices.Dimensional analysis to verify the inner diameter (id) and outer diameter (od) was not performed, as no separations were found in the devices analyzed.The complaint reported by the customer as ¿catheter sheath introducer (csi)~ separated¿ was confirmed according with the attached pictures where a separated cannula was seen.However, there are no complaints against the sterile devices.There were no separations or anomalies noted to the 8 devices that could be related to the failures reported against the affected devices.The root cause of the separation cannot be conclusively determined from an image and the returned sterile devices did not show any anomalies that could be related to the reported event.Based on the information provided, exposure to a scalpel or continued use of a kinked device may be contributing factors to the separation.Users are trained to inspect for signs of damage prior to and during use.Any product with damage is not to be used.Information for safety is provided in the products labeling with the intent to make the user aware of the risks.According to the instructions for use (ifu), although not intended as a mitigation of risk, ¿if increased resistance is felt upon insertion of the csi, or an intravascular device through the csi, investigate the cause before continuing.If the cause cannot be determined and corrected, discontinue the procedure and withdraw the csi.¿ based on the available information, there is no indication that the event is related to the device design or manufacturing process.Therefore, no preventative or corrective actions will be taken at this time.
|