• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/05/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a2, a3a, a3b, a4, a5 and a6: unknown/not provided.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section e1: telephone number: (b)(6).Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation as it was discarded; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.An attempt to obtain additional information was conducted, however, there is no additional information available.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the surgeon implanted a preloaded monofocal intraocular lens (iol) and once unfolded, it had a giant gouge or flap on the posterior side of the lens.No issues were reported with the preloaded injector.Lens was removed and a new lens was implanted in the same procedure.No other complications.Additional information stated that the lens was cut up and disposed off.No other information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: device evaluation: the suspect product was not received; however, a photo was provided by the customer.The photo the customer provided was evaluated.The photo shows the suspect lens implanted in an eye and a large divot can be observed in the optic of the lens.No further issues were identified.Since no product has been received, no further evaluation was performed.The complaint issue "lens damaged" was identified during photo evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be confirmed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key20801348
Report Number3012236936-2024-000317
Device Sequence Number12453544
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731660
UDI-Public(01)05050474731660(17)260831
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCA
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/21/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2026
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0155
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/06/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/23/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date11/27/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/21/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured08/31/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-