| Model Number |
CFB33 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
10/25/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The event unit is anticipated to return to applied medical for evaluation.A follow-up report will be sent upon completion of investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Procedure performed: laparoscopic removal of left ovarian cyst.Event description: during removal of specimen with a retrieval bag it was noticed on the screen that the trocar was broken at the tip.Bits of the trocar had broken off.Once the trocar had been removed all the pieces made up the trocar.Additional information received from an applied medical representative via email on 18nov2024: patient status is unknown at the time of reporting.The tm stated ' i¿m not sure how i can find this out if the theatre staff don't have this answer.The hospital did report this from their end as well.Additional information received from an applied medical representative via email on 20nov2024: the tm stated that the theatre team were not aware of or did not state there was patient injury.Intervention: removed the trocar from patient and continued to finish the procedure.Patient status: no patient injury or illness was reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Procedure performed: laparoscopic removal of left ovarian cyst.Event description: during removal of specimen with a retrieval bag it was noticed on the screen that the trocar was broken at the tip.Bits of the trocar had broken off.Once the trocar had been removed all the pieces made up the trocar.Additional information received from an applied medical representative via email on 18nov24: patient status is unknown at the time of reporting.The tm stated ' i¿m not sure how i can find this out if the theatre staff don¿t have this answer.The hospital did report this from their end as well.Additional information received from an applied medical representative via email on 20nov24: the tm stated that the theatre team were not aware of or did not state there was patient injury.Additional information received from an applied medical representative via email on 16dec24: the trocar was inserted ' with rotation while in advancing in the cavity' and there was no difficulty during insertion.The trocar was not used with a robot.It was confirmed the only instrument that was inside of the cannula at the time of the incident was a specimen bag.Regarding patient ' no visible injury noted after the trocar was broken'.Intervention: removed the trocar from patient and continued to finish the procedure.Patient status: no visible injury noted after the trocar was broken.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The event unit was returned to applied medical for evaluation, along with two (2) pieces of a clear fragment.Visual inspection confirmed the complainant¿s experience of a cannula tip fracture.The clear fragments were identified to be part of the cannula tip.Based on the condition of the returned unit, it is likely that the cannula tip fractured was due to instrumentation coming into contact with the tip and/or excess force was exerted on the tip during the procedure.It is also possible that the cannula tip material was more susceptible to fracture.A historical trend analysis and review of production records was performed and no relevant documentation was identified.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|