• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL RGDLOOP ADJUSTABLE LONG; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL RGDLOOP ADJUSTABLE LONG; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 232448
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
Date of Event 09/15/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H11 additional narrative: a1: patient identifier: (b)(6).Investigation summary
=
> the complaint device was implanted in the patient, therefore the device was not returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.This complaint file was opened to document complaints derived through clinical research data.The clinical research data indicated a j&j medtech orthopaedics product failure(s).Since there was no contact information, no follow-up attempts could be performed.It is unknown if complaints derived from this clinical research data were previously reported and documented in the j&j medtech orthopaedics complaint system at the time of occurrence as no product code/lot number information was provided to perform the search.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number (103l925), and no non-conformance was identified.Based on the current available information, we cannot determine a root cause for the reported failure.If additional information is received in the future, we will reopen the complaint and perform the investigation as appropriate.It has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed and there is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
 
Event or Problem Description
This is report 2 of 4 for (b)(4).It was reported through a post market clinical research study that a patient had undergone an anterior cruciate ligament (acl) reconstruction with meniscal repair procedure on (b)(6) 2024, using a milagro advance screw 10x23mm device, a rgdloop adjustable long, a truespan 12 degree peek device and a 4.75 healix advance kntls peek device.According to the report, the patient had a retear of his reconstructed acl resulting in re-operation/revision where all of the initial hardware was removed and revised.There were no reports of delay in the procedure reported.The status of the patient was unknown.No additional information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H11 additional narrative: h11: the investigation summary has been updated to reflect the correct information.Investigation summary : the complaint device was implanted in the patient, therefore the device was not returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.This complaint file was opened to document complaints derived through clinical research data.The clinical research data indicated a j&j medtech orthopaedics product failure(s).Since there was no contact information, no follow-up attempts could be performed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number (103l925), and no non-conformance was identified.Based on the current available information, we cannot determine a root cause for the reported failure.If additional information is received in the future, we will reopen the complaint and perform the investigation as appropriate.It has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed and there is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H11 correction narrative: upon further review of this complaint, it was determined that the reported event was erroneously reported; and therefore, is being retracted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RGDLOOP ADJUSTABLE LONG
Common Device Name
FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ  02400
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle CH-24 00
SZ   CH-2400
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
3035526892
MDR Report Key20835317
Report Number1221934-2024-04283
Device Sequence Number4058871
Product Code MBI
UDI-Device Identifier10886705024100
UDI-Public(01)10886705024100(10)103L925(17)251130
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateUT
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K140324
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Study,Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/30/2025
Device Catalogue Number232448
Device Lot Number103L925
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/28/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/10/2024
02/13/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/03/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/10/2024
02/20/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured12/09/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age39 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-