• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Crack (1135)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/19/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the preloaded intraocular lens (iol) was defective; the tip of the inserter was bent.The surgeon tried to use it, but the lens failed to slide through.There was patient contact.Through follow up, it was learned that the lens itself was not damaged, just the tip of the cartridge/inserter.The procedure was completed successfully with another lens implanted in the left eye.There was no patient injury and no medical or surgical intervention was required.Patient outcome was good.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record and complaint history for production order for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts were made to obtain the missing information; however, no additional information has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The product was received for evaluation.Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: dec 18, 2024.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection was performed on the returned suspect product and found the plunger rod was fully retracted.The lens could be observed to be stuck in the mouth of the cartridge and was rotated counterclockwise from the standard advancement location.Viscoelastic residue was distributed through the length of the cartridge and the cartridge as well as the cartridge tip was damaged.The lens module and device assembly were inspected and presented with no issues.The plunger rod advancement was inspected and presented with no issues however the plunger rod tip was damaged.The lens was removed from the cartridge and cleaned presenting with cosmetic issues.The complaint issue was identified during product evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Therefore, there is no indication of a product deficiency or product malfunction.Conclusion: based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.The complaint issue reported could not be confirmed and no product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key20843528
Report Number3012236936-2024-000325
Device Sequence Number7984377
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731776
UDI-Public(01)05050474731776(17)270925
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/08/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0210
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/19/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/03/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/04/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/08/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/25/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-