• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. SWIFTPAC COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. SWIFTPAC COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 400SWPC45
Medical Device Problem Codes Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012); Premature Separation (4045)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Date of Event 11/08/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned swiftpac coil confirmed that the embolization coil was detached.Evaluation revealed that the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly, the pull wire was in its initial position within the pusher assembly distal tip and the embolization coil was detached.If the swiftpac coil is retracted against resistance during use, the pusher assembly may elongate beyond the reach of the pull wire and result in the embolization coil detaching from its pusher assembly.Based on the reported event, the root cause of the resistance could not be determined.The detached embolization coil was not returned for evaluation.Further evaluation revealed that the pusher assembly was kinked throughout its length.This damage is incidental to the reported complaint and likely occurred during packaging for return.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the middle meningeal artery (mma) using a swiftpac coil (swiftpac) and a non-penumbra microcatheter.It was reported that the patient¿s anatomy was mildly tortuous.During the procedure, while attempting to place the swiftpac into the target location, the physician determined that the swiftpac was too long for the target vessel.The physician decided to remove the swiftpac for a shorter swiftpac.While retracting the swiftpac, the physician experienced resistance and noticed that the swiftpac unintentionally detached in the common carotid artery (cca).The physician then used a balloon to push the swiftpac into the external carotid artery (eca).The physician determined that the swiftpac was safe to be left inside the patient.The procedure was completed using non-penumbra coils and the same microcatheter.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SWIFTPAC COIL
Common Device Name
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer (Section G)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key20844478
Report Number3005168196-2024-00399
Device Sequence Number8100117
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00815948029576
UDI-Public00815948029576
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K230284
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 12/03/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number400SWPC45
Device Lot NumberF00013017
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/14/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/09/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/04/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/24/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-