|
A visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The reported material separation was confirmed.The reported difficult to advance could not be tested as it was based on operational context.A review of the production records and the corrective and preventive actions (capa) database was performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a query of the complaint handling database for the reported lot revealed no indication of a lot specific issue.The investigation determined the reported difficulties and treatment appear to be related to the operational context of the procedure.It was reported that the guide wire met resistance with the patient¿s moderately calcified, mildly tortuous, and 90-95% stenosed lesion, resulting in the difficulty during advancement.It is likely that manipulation of the wire, when resistance was met, contributed to the reported separation.The separated portion of the wire was removed using a snare.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling; therefore, no product-related corrective action will be implemented in this case.
|