• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU150
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Blurred Vision (2137)
Date of Event 10/23/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a4: weight: unknown; requested but not provided.Section a5: ethnicity: unknown; requested but not provided.Section a6: race: unknown; requested but not provided.Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record and complaint history for production order for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts were made to obtain the missing information; however, no additional information has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that after the preloaded toric intraocular lens (iol) was implanted in the eye patient's left eye, the patient was not happy with overall distance vision and there may be a need for explant, however the surgeon wanted to wait to see if the distance vision improved.Additional information was received reporting that the iol was explanted in a secondary surgery from the patient's left eye due to the patient having a tough time adjusting due to anisometropia resulting from refractive power between eyes.The issue was first identified in a post-operative examination.There was no calculation issue.Another johnson and johnson iol was implanted as replacement (diu150 +22.0 diopter).There was no patient injury and no additional medical or surgical interventions required.The patient status is unknown.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional info: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 2/3/2025.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer¿ yes.Device evaluation: the lens was received in a specimen cup.The lens was inspected under magnification.Visual inspection reveal the lens was received cut in half and coated in viscoelastic residue.The lens was cleaned, presenting with no further issues.No issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issues reported were identified during product evaluation.The ¿lens cut¿ observed during product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be confirmed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key20845866
Report Number3012236936-2024-000311
Device Sequence Number3771187
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474746602
UDI-Public(01)05050474746602(17)251023
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCO
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/18/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/23/2025
Device Model NumberDIU150
Device Catalogue NumberDIU150U230
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/07/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/03/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/04/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/18/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/23/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age66 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-