• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG SHUNTASSISTANT 2.0 20; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG SHUNTASSISTANT 2.0 20; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX102T
Medical Device Problem Code Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Date of Event 11/01/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a shuntassistant 2.0 (#fx102t) was implanted according to the complainant, the shunt system caused an overdrainage.The patient underwent a revision procedure on (b)(6) 2024.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.The complainant device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Same event as med.Watch no: 3004721439-2024-00366.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Visual inspection: during the investigation, no significant deformations or damage of the valves was determined.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that all components are permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of over- drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valve is tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the shuntassistant 2.0 is operating within the accepted tolerance in the vertical position, but not within the specified tolerances in the horizontal position.A slower outflow of shuntassistant 2.0 could be determined.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valve, deposits were found.Results: based on our investigation results, we can determine a slower outflow in the valve.The determined deposits can be named as the cause for the functional deviation.Organic material in the cerebrospinal fluid can influence the function temporarily and are known side effects in hydrocephalus therapy.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SHUNTASSISTANT 2.0 20
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key20846861
Report Number3004721439-2024-00367
Device Sequence Number3771339
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906501587
UDI-Public4041906501587
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K190174
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 12/04/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/17/2024
Device Model NumberFX102T
Device Catalogue NumberFX102T
Device Lot Number20044252
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/11/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/11/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/04/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/18/2019
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age14 YR
Patient SexUnknown
Patient Weight30 KG
-
-