• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NEURAVI LTD. EMBOTRAP; CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NEURAVI LTD. EMBOTRAP; CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ET309645
Medical Device Problem Code Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/20/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, age, sex, gender, weight, race, and ethnicity were not provided.Section h.3: the device is available to be returned for evaluation and testing.However, it has not been received to date.If the device returns, a device investigation will be performed.A review of the manufacturing documentation associated with this lot: (24g058av) top and sub assembly presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no non-conformance's related to device manufacture or inspection.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by johnson & johnson medtech, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, johnson & johnson medtech, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Event or Problem Description
The healthcare professional reported that during a thrombectomy procedure, when the physician removed the 6.5mm x 45mm embotrap iii revascularization device (et309645 / 24g058av) after he made the first pass, and he noticed that the device ¿may have had some of the coating flaking off.¿ the physician set aside the device and opened a new device to use for the procedure.There was no report of any negative patient impact.On 04-dec-2024, additional information was received.Per the information, the procedure was on (b)(6) 2024.It was targeting the left internal carotid artery (ica) terminus.The clot was a large fibrin rich hyperdense clot.The target vessel had mild to moderate tortuosity.There was no physical damage to the stent / cage assembly.The damage reported was clarified as ¿about 2 cm proximal to the proximal radiopaque 20mm coil¿ flaked off.The concomitant microcatheter used was a phenom¿ 21 microcatheter (medtronic).The replacement device was another 6.5mm x 45mm embotrap iii device (et309645).The information also confirmed there was no negative patient impact and no delay in the procedure as a result of the reported issue.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to report that the product analysis lab received the complaint device on 06-jan-2025.A supplemental 3500a report will be submitted once the product investigation has been completed.Updated sections: b.4, d.9, g.3, g.6.H.2, h.3, h.6, and h.11.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to report the investigational finding of the returned device.The complaint product was returned and received for evaluation and analysis.The investigation is documented below.Investigation summary: the complaint device was received.The examination under magnification of the returned embotrap device showed no evidence of damage or deformation on outer cage, inner channel, distal or proximal coils and bonds.The visual inspection indicates that the returned embotrap device was correctly assembled and manufactured, with all adhesive bonds and joints complete and undamaged.It was reported that after the first thrombectomy pass, the physician noticed the device ¿may have had some of the coating flaking off¿.Visual inspection of the returned embotrap iii showed no evidence of coating flaking.The returned embotrap device could not pass through a 0.0195- inch id tube, due to a buildup of biological matter at 250mm from the distal tip.The polytetrafluoroethylene (ptfe) insertion tool was dimensionally inspected and found to be within specification for the inner and outer diameter.The complaint event was therefore not confirmed.There is no indication that this complaint was a result of a defect or malfunction of the embotrap device.A review of the manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (24g058av) top and sub assembly presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no non-conformances related to device manufacture or inspection.As part of johnson & johnson medtech quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Based on the manufacturing documentation review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.Updated sections: b.4, g.3, g.6.H.2, h.3, h.6, and h.11.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EMBOTRAP
Common Device Name
CATHETER, THROMBUS RETRIEVER
Manufacturer (Section D)
NEURAVI LTD.
block 3
ballybritt business park
galway H91 K 5YD
EI  H91 K5YD
Manufacturer (Section G)
ADVANT MEDICAL
parkmore business park west
galway H91 P V0V
EI   H91 PV0V
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
303552-6892
MDR Report Key20847977
Report Number3011370111-2024-00111
Device Sequence Number18128277
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier10886704082859
UDI-Public(01)10886704082859(11)240626(17)270626(10)24G058AV
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateSD
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K211338
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/15/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberET309645
Device Lot Number24G058AV
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/20/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/06/2025
01/15/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/04/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/06/2025
01/15/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/26/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
PHENOM¿ 21 MICROCATHETER (MEDTRONIC)
Patient SexUnknown
-
-