| Model Number |
720074-01 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
11/19/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient, enrolled in the it matters clinical study, with this spectra penile prosthesis (spp), presented with the device undersized; therefore, a replacement surgery was scheduled.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information updated: b5: describe event/problem b1: adverse event/product problem.B2: outcomes attrib to adv event.D6b: explant date.H1: type of reportable event.H6: patient codes, impact codes, evaluation conclusion codes.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient, enrolled in the it matters clinical study, with this spectra penile prosthesis (spp), presented with a floppy glans due to the device being undersized; therefore, a replacement surgery was performed, and the event was resolved.No further patient complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information updated: b5: evaluation conclusion codes.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient with this spectra penile prosthesis (spp) presented with a floppy glans due to the device being undersized; therefore, a replacement surgery was performed, and the event was resolved.No further patient complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient with this spectra penile prosthesis (spp) presented with a floppy glans due to the device being undersized; therefore, a replacement surgery was performed, and the event was resolved.No further patient complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device is not available for analysis; therefore, no physical or visual analysis of the product could be performed.The device history record (dhr) review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The device instructions for use (ifu) was reviewed.The reported patient symptom is a known risk associated with this device type and indicated as such in the instructions for use.Based on the information available, the conclusion code of known inherent risk of device was assigned to this investigation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|