• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Scratched Material (3020)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/13/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a3b, a4 and a5: unknown/ asked but not available.Section b3: date of event: unknown, not provided.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, remains implanted in the eye.Section e1:surgeon's email address and phone number: unknown/ asked but not available.Section h3: other 81: the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported by surgeon that there were imperfections in the preloaded intraocular lens(iol) like scuffs that were noticed while hydrating the stroma.There was no patient injury.From additional information it was learnt that it was not known how the scuffs on the lens were formed.There were no any visual issues experienced by the patient.The lens was not explanted.There was no use error.No other information is available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: device evaluation: the customer provided photos were evaluated by a post market safety surveillance officer.The picture shows 2 scratch like marks.Due to the marks location, it is not expected for the observed issues to impact the patient visual function; however, the definitive clinical impact and the incident root cause cannot be determined per a photo assessment.Conclusion: the complaint issue cosmetic issues was identified during photo evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key20872748
Report Number3012236936-2024-000321
Device Sequence Number8801105
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731752
UDI-Public(01)05050474731752(17)260829
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateGA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/08/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/29/2026
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0200
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/13/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/17/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/06/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/08/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured08/28/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age61 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-