• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT THEON PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT THEON PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 6900PTFX
Medical Device Problem Codes Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Thickening of Material (4056)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 11/14/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The subject device is not available for evaluation, as it remains implanted in the patient.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through implant patient registry that a patient with a 29mm 6900ptfx mitral valve underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of 9 years, 6 months due to unknown reason.The procedure was performed with a 29mm 9755rsl transcatheter valve.Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional customer complaint.The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Updated sections: b5, b7, d4 expiration date, g3, g6, h4, h6 component code, health effect - clinical code, device code(s), type of investigation, investigation findings, and investigation conclusions.The device history record was reviewed and shows that this device met all manufacturing specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Leaflet thickening may be attributed to structural valve deterioration (svd) and/or non-structural valve dysfunction (nsvd).Svd is a logical and expected consequence of the chemical, mechanical, and immunological processes associated with bhv implantation.The common endpoint of all these factors is calcification and degradation.Svd is an acquired condition, intrinsic to bioprosthetic valves, characterized by deterioration of the leaflets or supporting structures, leading to thickening, calcification, tearing, or disruption of the prosthetic valve materials.These changes result in valvular dysfunction manifesting as stenosis and/or regurgitation with a consequent drop in hemodynamic efficacy of the valve.Prior investigations and extensive literature review have shown that svd is predominantly related to patient factors and implant duration rather than to manufacturing issues.Events related to device design, manufacturing, or use error tend to manifest at an earlier implant duration.Nsvd is defined as any abnormality not intrinsic to the valve itself that results in dysfunction of the prosthetic valve.The term nsvd refers to problems that are not directly related to failing valve components, yet it results in dysfunction of the prosthetic valve.There can be several causes of early leaflet thickening, such as early thrombosis/halt, early endocarditis or host tissue overgrowth.Through further investigation, it was determined that the root cause of this event was most likely due to patient related factors.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through implant patient registry and investigation that a patient with a 29mm 6900ptfx mitral valve underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of 9 years, 6 months due to mild leaflet thickening/restricted motion with stenosis and regurgitation.The patient presented with heart failure.The procedure was performed with a 29mm 9755rsl transcatheter valve with no apparent complications.The patient was transferred to icu.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT THEON PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS
Common Device Name
REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
mle fl2- office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key20886736
Report Number2015691-2024-09423
Device Sequence Number15663398
Product Code DYE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103163605
UDI-Public(01)00690103163605(17)180323(11)140324
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMO
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P860057
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2015
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/15/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/23/2018
Device Model Number6900PTFX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/15/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/06/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/09/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/14/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured03/24/2014
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Life Threatening; Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age67 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-