• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DCB00
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Flashers (1864); Visual Disturbances (2140); Halo (2227)
Date of Event 05/28/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a4: weight: unknown; requested but not provided.Section a5: ethnicity: unknown; requested but not provided.Section a6: race: unknown; requested but not provided.Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record and complaint history for production order for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.An attempt was made to obtain the missing information; however, no additional information has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the fully inserted preloaded monofocal intraocular lens (iol) was explanted from the patient's right eye in a secondary surgery due to dysphotopsia, glare, ghosting, starburst, halos, and reduced contrast sensitivity.The issue was first identified during a post-operative examination.Directions for use were followed.A non-johnson and johnson iol was implanted as replacement (li61ao +16.0).No unplanned sutures, vitrectomy, or incision enlargement was required.The patient is fully recovered.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The product was received for evaluation.Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: dec 18, 2024.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection was performed on the returned suspect product and found the lens was received cut in half and coated in viscoelastic residue.The lens pieces were cleaned, and one half presented with the edge and optic body damaged.No further evaluation was performed.The complaint issues reported were not identified during product evaluation.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.The complaint issue reported could not be confirmed and no product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key20887781
Report Number3012236936-2024-000312
Device Sequence Number20808902
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474635999
UDI-Public(01)05050474635999(17)260620
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateWA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/08/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/20/2026
Device Model NumberDCB00
Device Catalogue NumberDCB0000155
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/18/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/27/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/09/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/08/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/20/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age55 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-