|
|
| Model Number |
N/A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Separation Problem (4043)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994)
|
| Date of Event |
11/19/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).D10.Blunt tip screw, ã¿ 4x44mm item# 47248604440 lot# 3169756.Blunt tip screw, ã¿ 4x42mm item# 47248604240 lot# 3176655.Blunt tip screw, ã¿ 4x42mm item# 47248604240 lot# 3185192.Cortical bone screw, ã¿ 4x24mm item# 47248612440 lot# 3177543.Cortical bone screw, ã¿ 4x24mm item# 47248612440 lot# 3185200.Proximal humerus nail cap, ã¿ 10.5x2.5mm item# 47248801002 lot# 3185231.G2.Report source: japan.The device will not be returned for analysis; however, an investigation of the reported event is in progress.Once the investigation is completed, a supplemental medwatch 3500a will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that an ann nail surgery was performed.After 5 months from the initial surgery, the surgeon found that #2 proximal screw had migrated out of the proper position.The patient complained of pain and revision surgery was performed to remove the migrated screw.The removed screw was temporarily returned but was immediately returned to the customer.Diligence is completed and no further information on the reported event has been provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The following sections were updated: b4, g3, g6, h2, h3, h6, h10, h11.No product was returned for evaluation.There are some pictures provided of the screw.It is possible to see that the threaded part is partially flattened.The head of the blunt tip screw appears inconspicuous.A review of the device manufacturing records confirmed no abnormalities or deviations.Review of complaint histories identified additional similar complaints for the reported products and additional similar complaints for the reported part and lot combinations.Complaints are monitored through monthly complaint review in order to identify potential adverse trends.It can be assumed that multiple contributing factors, related to either patient condition and behavior or implantation procedure, contributed to the migration of the screws.If and to what extent any of these aspects may have influenced the migration of the screw remains unknown.An additional deeper investigation was performed which identified the design limitation of the corelock mechanism of the affixus nail as a potential contributing factor.As part of the deeper investigation, a scientific literature search was conducted and a systematic review of the outcome of intramedullary nailing for acute proximal humerus fracture showed that screw migration and perforation into the joint is the second most common complication following secondary loss of reduction.In addition, scientific literature of competitor and predicate devices were assessed.This review has shown that the affixus® natural nail® proximal humeral system performs better and/or in equal range in comparison with legally marketed similar devices.In conclusion, as the cause may be multifactorial an exact root cause could not be identified for the migration of the screw.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Diligence is completed and no further information on the reported event has been provided.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|