|
|
| Catalog Number |
J333H |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an unknown procedure on an unknown date and suture was used.The needle was broken during use.The doctor said the needle was bent more easily than usual.No piece fell into the patient.It was not a control release needle.No adverse patient consequences were reported.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint (b)(4).H6.Component code: g07002 - device not returned.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: there was no problem to the patient, no piece fell into the patient.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.- was there any additional tissue damage as a result of searching for the needle piece(s)? - name of procedure? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 1/10/2025 this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information was requested, the following was obtained: - lot number? =>tjmbrz - name of procedure? =>unk - provide the source or name and title of external person providing answers to follow-up (external person submitting answers to sales rep or loc/bq).=>(b)(6) - please perform and document the follow up attempt for product return.Please document the shipment tracking number in notes or rmao sections.=>the device has been received at sukagawa and will be shipped.Please check rmao.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information: h6, d9, h3, h4.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device, and no non-conformances were identified.H3 investigation summary: the product received for analysis was j333h.As part of our quality process, the manufacturing records of this lot-serial number were reviewed, and the manufacturing standards were met prior to the release of this batch.Visual inspection and metallurgical analysis were performed on the returned product.The needle was noted with marks that appears to be by surgical instrument.A fracture was observed in the body of the needle.A scanning electron microscope (sem) was used to examine the fracture surfaces and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation of the sample revealed the fracture was predominantly composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile fracture mode.Mechanical damage and a cup-and-cone shaped fracture were observed providing additional evidence that the failure was induced by mechanical deformation leading to ductile overload.This was a ductile fracture.The evidence of this examination indicates that the breakage occurred from mechanical deformation, indents and scratches, due to gripping, bending and overstressing of the needle.There is no evidence of any material flaw that would cause premature failure.The needle breakage was confirmed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|