|
ETHICON INC. PRLNE BLU 4X30IN 6-0 D/A BV-1; SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYPROPYLENE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
M8709 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Separation (1562)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
11/18/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.D4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.H6 component code: g07002 pending device evaluation.The product upon which this medwatch is based has been received, however, the product evaluation is not yet complete.Any further information derived from the evaluation will be submitted in a supplemental 3500a form.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: - how many devices demonstrated the alleged deficiency? - name of the procedure? -what was being done when the needles pulled-off (removal from package / during handling prior to use on patient/ during passage through tissue / during tying / post-op)? -did the needle fall into the patient? if so, please provide the following information: -were x-rays taken to locate the needle? -was the needle piece removed from the patient during the same procedure? c.Does the needle remain in the patient¿s tissue? d."what tissue structure is it located? size of the needle retained e.Are any plans in place to remove the needle piece in future?" -if retained, what is the surgeon's opinion of consequences to the patient? answer received: three needles popped off prematurely while suturing during a carotid.All needles were retrieved.The manufacturing records could not be reviewed as the batch/lot number is unknown.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an unknown procedure on (b)(6) 2024 and suture was used.During the procedure, the needle prematurely popped off.The needle was retrieved and there was no patient harm.There were no adverse patient consequences reported.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 1/14/2025.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.H6 component code: g07002 no device problem found.H3 investigational summary: the product was returned to ethicon for evaluation.One straight folder packet with two undispensed strands was received for analysis.Product code m8709 which is multistrand and requires four strands double armed per packet.The complaint sample was not received for evaluation.In order to evaluate the conditions of the returned samples, the swage and attachment area were noted to be as expected.The suture was dispensed without problems and examined along the strand to detect any issue related no defects were observed during evaluation.A functional test was performed using instron equipment and the pull force result was above the minimum requirements.The event described could not be confirmed as the device performed without any defect noted.It should be noted that as part of our quality process, each batch is randomly inspected and functionally tested during manufacturing to ensure the device meets the required specifications prior to shipment.The event described could not be confirmed as no product defect was identified, there may have been other circumstances or issues that occurred during the use of the device that could not be replicated during the laboratory analysis.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|