• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number ZLU375
Medical Device Problem Code Unstable (1667)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Visual Impairment (2138)
Date of Event 10/23/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section h3 no: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a toric intraocular lens (iol) was implanted in the patient's left eye at 93 degrees.At one day post-op, -1.00+1.50x120 20/25 and lens axis 89 degrees.On day # 8 post op, -2.50 +3.50 x119 20/20, lens at 63 degrees, (se) spherical equivalent -.75, decide to do a lens exchange to achieve se (spherical equivalent) of zero.Suspect iol was explanted on (b)(6) 2024.This was replaced with the same model lens 1.0d power size lower than the original iol.The replacement iol was implanted at 98 degrees.Surgery was completed successfully.There was no capsular tear, no incision enlargement, no vitrectomy, no sutures and no different medications.When the lens is in the correct position, the patient does well as she was.However, a few days later replacement lens rotated again.This report is for the initial intraocular lens that was explanted.A separate report is being submitted for the replacement iol that also rotated.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9.Device available for evaluation? yes.Returned to manufacturer on apr 8, 2025.Section h3.Device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Visual inspection under magnification was performed on the suspect product.The lens was found cut in half and coated in viscoelastic residue.The lens was cleaned and inspected, and no issues were observed that could cause or contribute to the complaint issue reported.No further evaluation was performed.The cut lens was observed during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS
van swietenlaan 5
groningen, groningen 9728 NX
NL  9728 NX
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key20929594
Report Number3012236936-2024-000333
Device Sequence Number8391322
Product Code MFK
UDI-Device Identifier05050474690936
UDI-Public(01)05050474690936(17)250407
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateIL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/01/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/07/2025
Device Model NumberZLU375
Device Catalogue NumberZLU375U100
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/18/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/29/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/13/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/01/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/07/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age39 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight70 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-