| Catalog Number |
305194 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Complete Blockage (1094)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/02/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Initial mdr submission.A follow up mdr will be submitted if additional information, a device evaluation, or a device history review is completed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Material # 305194 batch # 4159481.When speaking to providers my clear understanding is that what we have on hand is not working for their injections and creating both safety and quality concerns.They feel the 21g is too large and the 23 g is too small.We may need to find another solution to the 23g needle? 1.It plugs up on providers.2.The cap is so tight that it is difficult to remove without fear of damage or being poked.3.We went from 1 needle to 2, to meet the needs of patients and providers.Maybe we should go back to the 22g? 1 needle- multipurpose (steroid, gel, prp).4.Providers continue to use the 23g as it was a replacement for the 22g.The 22g, now 23g, needles are used for steroid injections.We are finding that the 23g needles are intermittently plugged.The 21 g needles are used for the gel injections as the 23g were too difficult to administer the gel injections.The 23g needles would sometimes "back fire" on the providers as they were pushing the gel into the patient.Gels injections are much denser and make it difficult to push through a small gauge.We initially did not have the 21g needles.When the 23g needles started backfiring we needed a larger gauge, thus we got the 21g.When we had the 22g needles, we were able to use the 22 for both the steroid and the gel.I was however able to connect with staff who reported another incident.Upon investigation it seems the needle itself was faulty; not containing an inner diameter.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4) follow up.It was reported the cap was tight and the needles were plugged resulting in backfire on providers.A device history record review was completed by our quality engineer team for provided material number 305194 and lot number 4159481.The review did not reveal any detected abnormalities during the production process that could have contributed to this defect and all quality tests were found to be within specification.As a sample was unavailable for return, a thorough sample investigation could not be completed.Based on the investigation results, an exact cause for this incident could not be identified.Should you again experience any problems with our product we would appreciate the opportunity to conduct a thorough analysis.Further action has not been determined necessary at this time.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional information received.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|