• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC. ALERE HCG DEVICE (SERUM/URINE); VISUAL, PREGNANCY HCG, PRESCRIPTION USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC. ALERE HCG DEVICE (SERUM/URINE); VISUAL, PREGNANCY HCG, PRESCRIPTION USE Back to Search Results
Model Number FHC-202
Medical Device Problem Code False Positive Result (1227)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 11/25/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
The customer reported receiving a total of 2 false positive hcg results while testing alere hcg (serum/urine) devices on two different patients.The first patient presented on (b)(6) 2024 prior to undergoing an unspecified surgical procedure.The patient provided a fresh urine sample was provided, which was tested, and the results were read at 3 minutes.A faint positive result was reported.As a result of the positive result, retesting was performed using a different device from the same kit and a negative hcg result was obtained.The customer reported no adverse events occurred as a result of the false positive result.No further information was provided.See mdr 2027969-2024-00218 for the mdr for the second patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Preliminary investigation findings: retained devices from the reported lot number were tested with hcg-negative clinical urine and 25miu/ml positive cut-off samples.The results were read at 3 minutes and all devices tested with negative samples yielded valid negative results and all devices tested with positive samples yielded positive results.No false results were observed during in-house testing.The case details were reviewed along with the complaint history for the reported issue and no indications of a systemic issue were identified.Manufacturing batch record review did not uncover any relevant non-conformance's and found that the lot met quality control specifications.Review of the risk management report for this product found that the reported issue is within the risk profile for this device; no new hazard has been identified.A root cause could not be determined from the available information as the reported issue was not replicated during testing of retention product.Complaints are tracked and trended on a monthly basis.Per the package insert: very low levels of hcg (less than 50 miu/ml) are present in urine and serum specimen shortly after implantation.However, because a significant number of first trimester pregnancies terminate for natural reasons, a test result that is weakly positive should be confirmed by retesting with a first morning urine or serum specimen collected 48 hours later.A number of conditions other than pregnancy, including trophoblastic disease and certain non-trophoblastic neoplasms including testicular tumors, prostate cancer, breast cancer, and lung cancer, cause elevated levels of hcg.Therefore, the presence of hcg in urine or serum specimen should not be used to diagnose pregnancy unless these conditions have been ruled out.As with any assay employing mouse antibodies, the possibility exists for interference by human anti-mouse antibodies (hama) in the specimen.Specimens from patients who have received preparations of monoclonal antibodies for diagnosis or therapy may contain hama.Such specimens may cause false positive or false negative results.This test provides a presumptive diagnosis for pregnancy.A confirmed pregnancy diagnosis should only be made by a physician after all clinical and laboratory findings have been evaluated.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
"h3 - device evaluated by mfg?", "h6 - adverse event problem", and "h11 - additional mfg narrative" were updated to include return testing.Investigation conclusion: retained and returned devices from the reported lot number were tested with hcg-negative clinical urine and 25miu/ml positive cut-off urine samples.The results were read at 3 minutes and all devices tested with negative samples yielded valid negative results and all devices tested with positive samples yielded positive results.No false results were observed during in-house testing.The case details were reviewed along with the complaint history for the reported issue and no indications of a systemic issue were identified.Manufacturing batch record review did not uncover any relevant non-conformances and found that the lot met quality control specifications.Review of the risk management report for this product found that the reported issue is within the risk profile for this device; no new hazard has been identified.A root cause could not be determined from the available information as the reported issue was not replicated during testing of retention or returned product.Complaints are tracked and trended on a monthly basis.Per the package insert: - very low levels of hcg (less than 50 miu/ml) are present in urine and serum specimen shortly after implantation.However, because a significant number of first trimester pregnancies terminate for natural reasons, a test result that is weakly positive should be confirmed by retesting with a first morning urine or serum specimen collected 48 hours later.- a number of conditions other than pregnancy, including trophoblastic disease and certain non-trophoblastic neoplasms including testicular tumors, prostate cancer, breast cancer, and lung cancer, cause elevated levels of hcg.Therefore, the presence of hcg in urine or serum specimen should not be used to diagnose pregnancy unless these conditions have been ruled out.- as with any assay employing mouse antibodies, the possibility exists for interference by human anti-mouse antibodies (hama) in the specimen.Specimens from patients who have received preparations of monoclonal antibodies for diagnosis or therapy may contain hama.Such specimens may cause false positive or false negative results.- this test provides a presumptive diagnosis for pregnancy.A confirmed pregnancy diagnosis should only be made by a physician after all clinical and laboratory findings have been evaluated.
 
Event or Problem Description
The customer reported receiving a total of 2 false positive hcg results while testing alere hcg (serum/urine) devices on two different patients.The first patient presented on (b)(6) 2024 prior to undergoing an unspecified surgical procedure.The patient provided a fresh urine sample was provided, which was tested, and the results were read at 3 minutes.A faint positive result was reported.As a result of the positive result, retesting was performed using a different device from the same kit and a negative hcg result was obtained.The customer reported no adverse events occurred as a result of the false positive result.No further information was provided.See mdr 2027969-2024-00218 for the mdr for the second patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ALERE HCG DEVICE (SERUM/URINE)
Common Device Name
VISUAL, PREGNANCY HCG, PRESCRIPTION USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC.
9942 mesa rim rd
san diego CA 92121
Manufacturer Contact
monika burrell
9942 mesa rim rd
san diego, CA 92121
8588052506
MDR Report Key20958595
Report Number2027969-2024-00219
Device Sequence Number20881728
Product Code JHI
UDI-Device Identifier10815845020116
UDI-Public(01)10815845020116(17)251219(10)0000825047
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateIA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K993065
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/27/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/19/2025
Device Model NumberFHC-202
Device Catalogue Number92225
Device Lot Number0000825047
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/09/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/26/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/13/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/17/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/27/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/21/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-