• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. LGN PS HIGH FLEX XLPE SZ 7-8 10MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. LGN PS HIGH FLEX XLPE SZ 7-8 10MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 71453177
Medical Device Problem Code Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Fall (1848); Failure of Implant (1924)
Date of Event 11/26/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, after a tka surgery performed on (b)(6) 2023, the patient knee kept dislocating in deep flexion and relocated in extension.The surgeon also reported that patient had a fall within first 2 weeks of primary surgery in 2023 and fractured patella.A revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2024, in order to exchange lgn ps high flex xlpe sz 7-8 10mm.Upon removal of primary insert, it was found that the post was broken off from the body of the insert.Post fragment was located posteriorly to femoral component by surgeon and removed from patient.Surgeon advises that insert post fracture most likely occurred when the patient fell in 2023.A new gns ii con ins sz7-8 13mm was implanted.The current health status of the patient is unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3,h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a patient complication related to a product problem with a smith+nephew device.The reported issue(s) relate to known inherent device and/or procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3,h6: the device was not returned for evaluation.However, the photographs were reviewed, and revealed that the post fractured off of the lgn ps high flex xlpe sz 7-8 10mm.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the instructions for use documents for knee systems revealed that the implant can break or become damaged as a result of strenuous activity or trauma.This has been identified as a warning and precaution.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.According to the inspection drawing, a visual verification that parts are free of damaged areas, burrs, steps, inclusions, porosities, sharp edges and cracks must be performed within the steps of the final inspection.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include postoperative care, patient anatomy, abnormal loading of limb, and/or injury.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LGN PS HIGH FLEX XLPE SZ 7-8 10MM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key20976837
Report Number1020279-2024-02696
Device Sequence Number4033055
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier00885556487143
UDI-Public885556487143
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryAS
PMA/510(K) Number
K071071
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Device Explanted Year2024
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/10/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number71453177
Device Lot Number22HM21771
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 11/26/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/07/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/19/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/10/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/30/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-