| Catalog Number |
0609190 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Component Missing (2306); Missing Information (4053)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
11/26/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during preparation for a chronic catheter placement procedure, the catheter was allegedly received without label.There was no patient contact.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported label missing issue as no objective evidence was provided for review.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that prior to a chronic catheter placement procedure, the catheter was allegedly received without label.There was no patient contact.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.One photo was provided for review.The photo shows the partial view of a cardboard carton which contains one shipping label and other two labels.The investigation is inconclusive for the reported label missing issue as the photo evidence provided is not sufficient to confirm the reported event.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.G2, g3, h6 (component, method).Section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A patient underwent a chronic catheter placement procedure using hickman catheter.Prior to procedure, the catheter was allegedly received without label.There was no patient contact.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A patient underwent a chronic catheter placement procedure using hickman catheter.Prior to procedure, the catheter was allegedly received without label.There was no patient contact.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation, one photo was provided for review.The photo shows the partial view of a cardboard carton which contains one shipping label and other two labels.The investigation is inconclusive for the reported missing information and missing component issues as the photo evidence provided is not sufficient to confirm the reported event.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.G3, h6 (device).Section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A patient underwent a chronic catheter placement procedure using hickman catheter.Prior to procedure, the catheter was allegedly received without label.There was no patient contact.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation, two photos were provided for review.The first photo shows the partial view of a cardboard box which has a sticker containing the shipping details.The second photo shows an unsealed cardboard box which contains one product pouch inside and another product pouch kept outside.Both tyvek label is noted to be blank without any information.The manufacturing evaluation states that the visual inspection of the image (1) showed a cardboard box which has a sticker containing the shipping details, and it was observed that the visible label on the right side of the box indicated a trifusion catheter 19 cm, and that there were 7 units inside.Inspection of the image (2) observed an individual package of the trifusion catheter, and no abnormality was observed in the tyvek of the tray.A closer view showed that there was a second tray inside the cardboard box.However, the 2 trays visible in this image were not contained within their cartons.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported missing information and missing carton issues as no objective evidence was provided for review.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.G3, h6 (result).Section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|