|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, age, sex, gender, weight, race, and ethnicity were not provided.Section d.2b: procode is krd/hcg.Section e.1: the initial reporter email address was not available / reported.Based on complaint information, the device is not available to be returned for analysis.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (31092859) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no internal actions related to device manufacture or inspection.Product analysis cannot be conducted as the product was not returned for analysis.No determination of causes and possible contributing factors could be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.With the information available and without the complaint product available to be returned for analysis, the reported product issue documented in the complaint cannot be confirmed through functional evaluation and analysis.Based on the manufacturing documentation review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.Assignment of root cause for the event remains speculative and inconclusive, based on the limited information provided and without the return of the complaint device; however, it is possible that clinical and procedural factors, including device manipulation / interaction may have contributed to the reported failure.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by johnson & johnson medtech, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, johnson & johnson medtech, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
|
The healthcare professional reported that during an endovascular embolization procedure, the 3mm x 6cm cerepak freeform xtrasoft (xcr120306 / 31092859) detached ¿flawlessly.¿ it was then reported that ¿it seemed like the coil positioning marker was left behind.¿ the microcatheter (unspecified brand) was removed and replaced.There was no negative patient impact.The procedure was reported as successfully completed without any delay.On 18-dec-2024, additional information was received.Per the information, the target of the procedure was the internal carotid artery (ica).Related to the positioning marker that reportedly was left behind, the information states, ¿it seemed to be about 3-4 inches of "wire" when speaking to the tech.Near where the positioning markers would be.¿ the marker was in the microcatheter and the microcatheter was removed and replaced.The concomitant microcatheter used was an sl-10® microcatheter (stryker); the replacement was another sl-10® microcatheter.
|