|
The alleged complaint could not be confirmed.Review of the complaint, efsrn6pr lot 1976108, etpkn6pr lot 169101, and eis6s10r lot 1966373, does not reveal any failure involving this implant.Mpo was made aware of this incident through the united kingdom national joint registry.The revised products were not returned, and no explant images, radiographs, operative notes, or other clinically relevant documentation is available for review to confirm this occurrence or source of the infection.This implant was implanted in the patient for approximately 10 months before revision due to infection was required.This lots were manufactured in 2023.Review of the design history record (dhr) for the subject manufacturing lot indicates that this implant was manufactured to specification, including all aspects related to cleaning and sterility.There is no trend for these implants and failure.No clinical documentation is available to confirm the infection or course of treatment.Infection is a known risk of any surgical procedure.No operative notes or other clinically relevant documentation have been provided to confirm this complaint.The source of the infection cannot be determined from the available information.The microport knee systems package insert (150806) lists "delayed wound healing; deep wound infection (early or late) which may necessitate removal of the prosthesis" as possible adverse effects of total knee arthroplasty.Without additional details regarding these specific cases and the products involved, no additional conclusions can be made.This issue will continue to be monitored through complaint tracking.
|