|
H10: as this malfunction is considered one event identified by the dealer; only one mdr report will be submitted for the reported quantity affected of twelve for this event.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, photos were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records were reviewed, and the lot met all release criteria.Investigation summary: the physical device and device packaging were not returned for evaluation.Two electronic photos were provided for review.The first photo shows a printed bd label for canister package with catalogue number sccan01, lot number vtjx0003, and use-by date 2027-02-01.The entire product packaging carton is not visible in the photo.The physical device is also not visible in the photo.No anomalies were noted with the printed label.The second photo shows a close up on a vacuum canister, the entire canister and canister lid are not visible within the photo.The information directly printed on the canister is ref number 1202san, expiry date 2027 09-01, and lot number 20240007.The canister appears to be within a clear plastic bag and no anomalies were noted.Therefore, the investigation is unconfirmed for the reported labeling issue.A review of the product labeling was performed and found no product labeling inadequacies.The 1200cc hi-flow canister [1202san] is a supplied component repackaged and relabeled by bd.The physical canister displays information from the supplier bemis healthcare, while the product carton label contains details from bd.The definitive root cause for the reported event could not be determined.Labeling review: a review was performed of the product labeling and labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, unit label, and manufacturing/assembly procedures).Per dc0702, canister-sccan01, the 1200cc hi-flow canister is manufactured and supplied by bemis healthcare to covington manufacturing for packaging/repackaging product number 1202san.Per mp0300242 rev.05, senorx shipping pack sccan01 manufacturing procedure and per ip0300970 rev.03, shipping pack sccan01/2 finished product inspection procedure, the end item sccan01 contains a non-sterile 1200cc hi-flow canister set in a 12pack configuration.At this level, covington manufacturing takes a shipping box containing 48 canister sets and converts to a 12pack configuration.Baw1461800 rev.01, label, carton, encor canister document provides a guide for on-demand permanent and variable print fields of the encor canister carton label.The product catalogue number, lot number and use-by date are variable fields manually typed by the covington operator and directly printed on the carton label by covington.The labeling review found no product labeling inadequacies.The physical canister displays information from the supplier bemis healthcare, while the product carton label contains details from bd.H10: g3, h6 (method, component).H11: h6 (result, conclusion).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|