• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number DRT225
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a3, a4, a5 and a6: unknown, as information was requested but not provided.Section b3 - date of event: exact date does not apply, between implantation on the (b)(6) 2024 and the examination on the (b)(6) 2024.Section e1 - email address: unknown, as information was requested but not provided section e1 - telephone number: (b)(6).Section h3 - the intraocular lens (iol) was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review and possible product return and evaluation, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Section h6 -health effect - clinical code: 4581: incision was enlarged an attempt has been made to obtain missing information.However, to date, no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that about one week after the preloaded toric intraocular lens was implanted, the patient's distant visual acuity didn't improved much.The distance visual acuity was 0.6 with the naked eye and near visual acuity was 40 cm with 0.2.The patient did not present with any corneal abnormality or fundus disease.The patient is under observation, but the implantation of a lens from a different manufacturer is being considered.There were no patient injuries, and no other medical intervention was required.Through follow-up we learned, that the lens was explanted on (b)(6) 2024 and the incision was enlarged.A lens from a different manufacturer was implanted.The preoperative uncorrected visual acuity was 0.3 and the corrected visual acuity was 0.8.The postoperative uncorrected visual acuity was 0.6 and the corrected visual acuity is unknown.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9 - device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9 - date returned to manufacturer: december 30, 2024.Section h3 - device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the lens received was inspected under magnification.The lens was cleaned and presented with damage to the optic body, and cosmetic scratches.No further evaluation was performed.The complaint issues reported were not identified during product evaluation.The other observed issues during product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.No product deficiency or product malfunction identified.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected data: upon further review it was noted that section g4: pma/510(k) number in the initial mdr was inadvertently submitted missing the ¿p¿ before the numerical value.The complete number is p980040.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS
van swietenlaan 5
groningen, groningen 9728 NX
NL  9728 NX
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key21044607
Report Number3012236936-2024-000342
Device Sequence Number8399388
Product Code MFK
UDI-Device Identifier05050474811966
UDI-Public(01)05050474811966(17)270228
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/09/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDRT225
Device Catalogue NumberDRT2250210
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/05/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/15/2025
12/15/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date12/30/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/04/2025
01/09/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/28/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age77 YR
Patient SexUnknown
-
-