|
|
| Catalog Number |
J270H |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 12/31/2024.H6 component code: g07002 - device not returned.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information was requested, the following was obtained: - lot number? -please clarify, which component broke during use on the patient, the needle or suture thread? please provide details.If the needle broke during use on the patient: - did any needle piece(s) fall into the patient? *if yes, o was\were the needle piece(s) retrieved during the same procedure? o were x-rays taken to locate the needle piece(s)? o what measures were taken to retrieve the broken piece(s)? o was there any additional tissue damage as a result of searching for the needle piece(s)? *if not retrieved, in what tissue structure the needle piece(s) were retained? is there any plan in place to remove the needle piece(s) in the future? please provide details.- provide the source or name and title of external person providing answers to follow-up (external person submitting answers to sales rep or loc/bq).- please confirm if the device is available for product return.If yes, please provide the status of the device as it has not been received for analysis.If the device has been shipped, please provide the shipment tracking details.As reported - needle broke during use, and was promptly removed from the field.Case continued.No patient consequence.No further information available.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.The lot/batch was not provided; therefore, a manufacturing record evaluation could not be performed.D4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an unknown procedure on an unknown date and suture was used.Surgeon was suturing with needle and after a few passes suture (needle) broke in two pieces needle was promptly taken off field and replaced.There were no patient consequences reported.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 2/6/2025.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information: d9, h3, h6.H3 investigational summary: the product received for analysis was j270h.As part of our quality process, the manufacturing records of this lot-serial number were reviewed, and the manufacturing standards were met prior to the release of this batch.Visual inspection and metallurgical analysis were performed on the returned product.The needle was noted with marks that appears to be by surgical instrument.A fracture was observed in the body of the needle.A scanning electron microscope was used to examine the fracture surfaces and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation of the sample revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile fracture mode.Mechanical damage, a cup-and-cone shaped fracture and macroscopic plastic deformation observed coincidental to the fracture provide additional evidence that the failure was induced by mechanical deformation leading to ductile overload.This was a ductile fracture.The evidence of this examination indicates that the breakage occurred from mechanical deformation, indents and scratches, due to gripping, bending and overstressing of the needle.There is no evidence of any material flaw that would cause premature failure.The needle breakage was observed.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Corrected h3 investigation summary: the product received for analysis was j270h.The manufacturing records couldn¿t be reviewed as the batch number is unknown.Visual inspection and metallurgical analysis were performed on the returned product.The needle was noted with marks that appears to be by surgical instrument.A fracture was observed in the body of the needle.A scanning electron microscope (sem) was used to examine the fracture surfaces and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation of the sample revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile fracture mode.Mechanical damage, a cup-and-cone shaped fracture and macroscopic plastic deformation observed coincidental to the fracture provide additional evidence that the failure was induced by mechanical deformation leading to ductile overload.This was a ductile fracture.The evidence of this examination indicates that the breakage occurred from mechanical deformation, indents and scratches, due to gripping, bending and overstressing of the needle.There is no evidence of any material flaw that would cause premature failure.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|