| Catalog Number |
121730052 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Osseointegration Problem (3003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
|
| Date of Event |
12/12/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2024, the patient underwent a tha for left hip joint oa.The procedure proceeded with the regular technique.However, acetabular reaming was shallow, and sufficient fixation of the cup was not achieved.There was a crack in the femur for the stem side, so that sufficient reduction could not be done with a cable.Subsequently, the stem size was changed.The surgery was completed successfully without any surgical delay.After surgery, the patient complained of pain.The surgeon guessed that it might be due to cup loosening.On (b)(6) 2024, a revision surgery was performed.The surgeon removed the cup easily by putting in a chisel a few times.The acetabular roof was reamed again, and the cup was replaced.The stem side was not loosening, so that the stem was left as it was.The inner head was replaced with a delta ts.The surgery was completed successfully.The x-ray showed no problems.No further information is available.This pc is related to (b)(4) which reports that sufficient fixation could not be achieved during the primary surgery.This pc reports that the cup loosening occurred after the primary surgery.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: no device associated with this report was received for examination.The product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A records evaluation (mre) was not perform as part of our company quality system process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending as part of the post-market surveillance.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device history lot: the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|