• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 12/17/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a5: ethnicity: unknown; requested but not provided.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as the lens remains implanted.Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation as it remains implanted; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record and complaint history for production order for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts were made to obtain the missing information; however, no additional information has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the preloaded intraocular lens (iol) haptics were stuck to the lens and would not spontaneously open.The issue was observed right after insertion into the right eye, viewed under the microscope.The surgeon had to manually pry the haptics with the kuglen manipulator for them to unfold.There was no post-operative complications.Balanced salt solution (bss) was used at room temperature.There were no delays in surgery before an attempt was made to advance the lens after the inserter was prepped.The lens remains implanted.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation: no suspect product was received; however, a photo and video were provided by the customer and were evaluated.The photo showed the lens implanted with the haptics stuck together.The video showed the haptics being separated by a medical tool.Since no product has been received, no further evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue "haptic stuck to optic" was not identified during photo and video evaluation.The observed "haptic stuck to haptic" is similar to the reported complaint issue.However, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be confirmed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key21055904
Report Number3012236936-2025-000001
Device Sequence Number20871467
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731769
UDI-Public(01)05050474731769(17)261207
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/13/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0205
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 12/17/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/23/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date01/02/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date02/13/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/07/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight111 KG
Patient RaceWhite
-
-