| Catalog Number |
07.02010.001 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth (4002)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/10/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Without a product return, no product evaluation is able to be conducted.Current information is insufficient to permit a valid conclusion about the cause of this event.If additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report and/or a conclusion can be drawn, a follow-up report will be sent.Reference reports 3012447612-2025-00000 through 3012447612-2025-00013.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a revision surgery was performed to address two closure tops that migrated out of their mating screws post-operatively.During the revision, an additional five closure tops were found to be loose in the construct.All seven closure tops and screws were removed and replaced during the revision.This is report six of fourteen for this event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a revision surgery was performed to address two closure tops that migrated out of their mating screws post-operatively.During the revision, an additional five closure tops were found to be loose in the construct.All seven closure tops and screws were removed and replaced during the revision.This is report six of fourteen for this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Corrections in d9 and h3.Additional information in h4 and h6: investigation type, findings, and conclusions.Device evaluation: the returned device matches the information in the complaint file and was examined.Visual inspection revealed signs of usage and some gouging on the hex.Root cause: a definitive root cause cannot be determined with the information provided.The post operative loosening resulting in a revision surgery could possibly be attributed to unknown patient or surgical factors.The driver pocket deformation could possibly be attributed to off axis or excessive forces applied during removal.Dhr review: the dhr was reviewed.There are no indications of manufacturing issues which would have contributed to this event and the device was likely conforming when it left highridge medical¿s control.Device usage: this device is used for treatment.If additional information is obtained that adds value to the relevant content of this report, a follow-up report will be sent.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|